Re: A Disgrace for TB! To Be CNET's Pick?

2002-05-02 Thread tracer
Hello Avenarius, On Thu, 2 May 2002 05:58:19 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, May 2, 2002, 10:58:19 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Avenarius wrote: So TB! is in CNET's top4, huh? The ratio of 96:4 is meaningless as you have to discount the massive advertising (IncrediMail)

Re: A Disgrace for TB! To Be CNET's Pick?

2002-05-01 Thread Avenarius
So TB! is in CNET's top4, huh? The ratio of 96:4 is meaningless as you have to discount the massive advertising (IncrediMail) and preinstalled-on-most-machines (Outlook Express) factors, along with the fact that most of the 96% have never heard of any alternatives to IncrediCrap -- in contrast

A Disgrace for TB! To Be CNET's Pick?

2002-04-25 Thread Avenarius
No comment... Alex. of Slovakia www.avenarius.sk This is a forwarded message From: CNET Download.com for PC Online#[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, 24 April 2002 at 21:02:20 (GMT -0700 PDT) Subject: This week: Elegant