Hi Marck, Thanks for jumping in on this one.
On Friday, November 03, 2000 @ 23:49:33 +, you
wrote the following about "A Question about
Distribution Lists"
Marck> [...] You would address a mail to "janrif " (no
Marc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
On 03 November 2000 at 18:16:39 GMT -0500 (which was 23:16 where I
live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points:
JR> [...] TB only uses multiple addresses in the address book by
JR> addressing a message to *all* addresses listed, e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
In looking thru FAQ I found the following msg.
From: Marck D. Pearlstone
Subject: Re: Addressbook
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 04:38:07 -0700
-
[...] TB only uses
Hello Benito,
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000 at 11:07:25 GMT +0100 (which was 2:07 AM
where I live) witnesses say Benito Carral typed:
> Do you know if it is possible to automatize the task? I mean that
> when you send a message to a address book group, it appears
> automatically "From: Benito", "To: My
Hello Mark,
M> Address the message to "My friends" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
M> then put all of your friends' addresses (or the name of the address
M> book group) in the BCC header. If you can't see that, then enable it
M> from the menu option "View -- Blind CC".
Thank you very much fo
Hello George Mealer,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:38:32 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, October 30, 2000, 18:38:32 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
George Mealer wrote:
GM> So what's the safest way to munge your address within the message, but
GM> still let other people know who you are? E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charlie,
On 30 October 2000 at 19:37:50 GMT + (which was 19:37 where I
live) Charlie (ceejay) wrote and made these points:
MDP>> Yes and no ;-). Yes, it's just to confuse the bots. No, it's not a
MDP>> real address.
Cc> Actually Marck nospam
Hi Marck,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, at 15:03:12 [GMT +] you wrote:
JR>> So, to be clear, does that mean that you just insert
JR>> ".nospam" to confuse the bots or is that a real
JR>> address?
MDP> Yes and no ;-). Yes, it's just to confuse the bots. No, it's not a
On 10/30/2000 at 8:01 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> It's a matter of where it appears. The archives for this list do not
MDP> show contributor's addresses but addresses in the body of a message
MDP> would appear.
It is worth noting that the way in which you're munging the address is
poor f
[about SPAM and being lucky..]
> As I'm sure you've noticed I don't 'munge' my e-mail address at all,
> surprisingly I receive very little spam, at least compared with
> others, guess I'm just lucky, now I've said that I'll probably be
> deluged with the stuff.
I guess your ISP is filtering SPAM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kevin,
On 30 October 2000 at 15:35:10 GMT + (which was 15:35 where I
live) Kevin wrote and made these points:
K> As I'm sure you've noticed I don't 'munge' my e-mail address at all,
K> surprisingly I receive very little spam,
It's a matter o
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Monday, October 30, 2000, 14:49:29, you wrote,
M> Hi Kevin,
K>> I may be mistaken but isn't it still possible for them to harvest
K>> e-mail addresses that have obvious anti-spam additions to the
K>> e-mail address?
M> Although it is possible, I don't think that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
On 30 October 2000 at 09:32:49 GMT -0500 (which was 14:32 where I
live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points:
Marck>> By seeding a published address with ".nospam", it is
Marck>> effectively soured for spam-bots and rendered useless
Ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kevin,
On 30 October 2000 at 14:26:52 GMT + (which was 14:26 where I
live) Kevin wrote and made these points:
Marck>> By seeding a published address with ".nospam", it is effectively
Marck>> soured for spam-bots and rendered useless in the ad
Hi Marck,
On Monday, October 30, 2000 14:02:00 + in
reference to "A Question about Distribution Lists"
you wrote:
Marck> By seeding a published address with ".nospam", it is
Marck> effectively soured for spam-bots and rendered use
Hi Marck,
On Monday, October 30, 2000, 14:02:00, you wrote,
Marck> By seeding a published address with ".nospam", it is effectively
Marck> soured for spam-bots and rendered useless in the address databases.
I may be mistaken but isn't it still possible for them to harvest
e-mail addresses th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
On 30 October 2000 at 07:58:13 GMT -0500 (which was 12:58 where I
live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points:
Marck>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...]
Marck>> BTW: I have added "nospam" to your address above since all
Marck>> postings to this
Hello Jan Rifkinson,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 07:58:13 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, October 30, 2000, 12:58:13 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JR> This is not directly about TB! but can you explain this
JR> "nospam" thing. I'm not sure I understand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
On Sunday, October 29, 2000 @ 03:36:51 +, you wrote
the following about "A Question about Distribution
Lists":
Marck> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...]
Marck> BTW: I have added "nospam&qu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Benito,
On 30 October 2000 at 04:22:06 GMT +0100 (which was 03:22 where I
live) Benito Carral wrote and made these points:
BC> I would like to send a message to a list and that when a
BC> person read it, he/she doens't read in the
Hello,
I would like to send a message to a list and that when a
person read it, he/she doens't read in the "TO" field each one of the
addresses of my list, just something like "My Friends" or similar. I
know how to do this with Pegasus Mail but I have not found the way t
21 matches
Mail list logo
