Friday, February 7, 2003, 2:09:48 AM, Peter scribbled:
PP> Thomas, be honest: even _with_ this information we can only "wildly
PP> guess". The only being _probably_ able to hunt it down (if the module
PP> is thebat.exe) are the guys at RITLabs.
PP> But w/o these information even they will not be a
Hello Thomas,
On Friday, February 7, 2003 at 6:10:12 AM you [TF] wrote (at least in
part):
>> I don't remember, but a dialog box of the bat indicating : access
>> violation to the adress , the next time I have it,i note !
TF> Yes please. The dialogue gives you the address as well as the modu
Hello telepro,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 05:57:32 +0100 GMT (07/02/03, 11:57 +0700 GMT),
telepro wrote:
> I don't remember, but a dialog box of the bat indicating : access
> violation to the adress , the next time I have it,i note !
Yes please. The dialogue gives you the address as well as the modu
Hello Thomas,
> Are you sure teh AV was caused by TB?
Yes, absolutely !
> What is the exact wording, which
> you have left out?
I don't remember, but a dialog box of the bat indicating : access
violation to the adress , the next time I have it,i note !
--
Best regards,
Christophe
Hello telepro,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 04:37:44 +0100 GMT (07/02/03, 10:37 +0700 GMT),
telepro wrote:
>> This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets
>> larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll
>> find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too!
Hello Spike,
Thursday, February 6, 2003, 1:18:27 PM, you wrote:
> This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets
> larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll
> find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too!
> Just happened (again) to me on Mo
Hello jwayne,
Thursday, February 6, 2003, 4:41:10 PM, you wrote:
> On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:22:02 AM, telepro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get access violations frequently when starting up TB and have for quite a
> while. As you said, it doesn't affect the operation of the program (ot
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:53:34 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, February 6, 2003, 7:53:34 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
> Hello Spike,
> NO! to bloat mail ;-)
He probably can can save half the space in that file by removing the
quotation a
Hello Mike Alexander,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 00:25:21 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, February 7, 2003, 7:25:21 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Mike Alexander wrote:
> Hi Spike,
> Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:18:27 PM, you wrote:
S>> This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tb
Hi Spike,
Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:18:27 PM, you wrote:
S> This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets
S> larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll
S> find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too!
S> Just happened (again) to me on
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:22:02 AM, telepro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
t> I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation in x ;
t> it does not disturb the good running of the programm, a simple OK and
t> the program continues...
t> Have you got
Hello Spike,
> On or about Thursday, February 06, 2003 at 06:22:02GMT +0100
> (which was 12:22 AM in the tropics where I live) telepro
> postulated, ruminated and made these points on the subject of
> "Access Violation in x ?":
> When I was a kid, I used to p
Hello telepro,
On or about Thursday, February 06, 2003 at 06:22:02GMT +0100
(which was 12:22 AM in the tropics where I live) telepro
postulated, ruminated and made these points on the subject of
"Access Violation in x ?":
t> Hello,
t> I've sometimes (perhaps one
Hello,
I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation in x ;
it does not disturb the good running of the programm, a simple OK and
the program continues...
Have you got these little errors, if yes, in which frequencies ?
Thanks,
Friendly,
Chris
14 matches
Mail list logo
