On Friday, September 3, 2004, 8:53:06 AM, Tom Duda wrote:
> This all began when I purchased a license for The Bat! v3.0. I
> received in good time both expected emails, inluding the one with my
> registration keys. Then I received a third email telling me that
> because a sertain staff member was
recipient...
Don't you think it was the first thing I did? It was. He's been
gone for more than 24 hours.
Sadly, the bounce messages coming through right now are the ones from
Saturday's postings. We have the bounce messages from the rest of the
week's submissions to get
Hallo Marck,
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:14:32 +0100GMT (18-7-02, 11:14 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
MDP> Any of you (and there are many) getting bounce messages from the
MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - sorry, but it's not our fault. It's theirs!
Can't you unsubscribe [EMAIL P
Hey Thomas,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62/Beta1) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 1:40:32 PM.
TF> It is the hexadecimal value of the space character in ASCII.
Good to know, that will make it easier to translate (ASCII tables a
Hello Tim,
On Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 7:14:07 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
PP>> Now there's only one question left: why does TB! not use '%xx',
PP>> but '\xx'?
TM> I would guess this is because macro's are delimited with %...
Quite another ide
Hello Tim,
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:26:25 -0400 GMT (18/07/02, 23:26 +0700 GMT),
Tim Musson wrote:
TM> | I think there is an RFC that defines things like /20,
TM> | but I don't know what it is - anyone else have a
TM> | source for info on the translations?
Hi Thomas,
on Thu, 18 Jul 2002 23:33:47 +0700GMT (18.07.02, 18:33 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TF> Hello Marck,
TF> I just sent them back another 35 (!) bounce messages. Sorry I copied
TF> you in, I didn't mean to mailbomb yo
Hello Marck,
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:14:32 +0100 GMT (18/07/02, 16:14 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> Any of you (and there are many) getting bounce messages from the
MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - sorry, but it's not our fault. It's theirs!
MDP> If anyone affected cou
Hey Peter,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 1:09:05 PM.
PP> Now there's only one question left: why does TB! not use '%xx',
PP> but '\xx'?
I would guess this is because macro's are delimited with
Hello Tim,
On Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 6:26:25 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
TM> This one is the template used to create the reply The odd stuff you see
TM> is mostly formatting (look for /20 - I believe that translates to a
TM> 'space' char).
It
Hello Paul,
On Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 5:57:38 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
PC> well, what I MEANT was not how to copy and paste, but what the H&!! it
PC> actually means.
Albeit it _really_ does not matter I could try to explain what me (and f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@18 July 2002, 11:57 -0400 (16:57 UK time) Paul Cartwright [PC] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D
Pearlstone:
PC>well, what I MEANT was not how to copy and paste, but what the H&!!
PC> it actually means.
What
Hey Paul,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Personal' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 11:57:38 AM.
PC>well, what I MEANT was not how to copy and paste, but what the H&!!
PC> it actually means.
I can take a stab at this one. However,
Hi Paul,
on Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:57:38 -0400GMT (18.07.02, 17:57 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PC> what the H&!! it actually means.
I'll try to explain how I understand it - it may help my own understanding
too. :-)
MDP>>> Active: 1
PC> active, what are
Hi Marck,
on Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:14:32 +0100GMT (18.07.02, 11:14 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MDP> Here's a filter that may help to automate the process ;-).
Phew, your filter came just in time. I had two of those messages each the
last two days. But I
On Thursday, July 18, 2002, 7:37 AM, you wrote:
PC>> this looks like a good filter to learn on !! How about explaining each
PC>> field for me ! If I could make a template from it ( to copy ;) using XXX
PC>> and YYY for existing names
MDP> Sorry - I perhaps should have explained for the unfa
Hello Jonathan,
Thursday, July 18, 2002, 4:25:13 PM, you wrote:
JA> Select the incoming mail folder icon, and press the CTRL and V key on
JA> your keyboard. That will paste the filter for you.
An so it did.
I am speechless.
Thank you! I have learned an awful lot from this group.
--
Regards,
Dear Marck,
Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 2:24:34 PM you wrote:
MDP> Let's try this again in a more accurate form:
Great! This one worked!
MDP> By removing the space after the "ReplyTemplate:" title TB won't be
MDP> able to wrap the line.
So, now I've learned that too. I didn't even know befo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, July 18, 2002, Ochrid wrote...
> The only possibility see is: Filters, Incoming mail, *New*, and then
> several fields to be filled in. Where on earth do I click and paste?
Select the incoming mail folder icon, and press the CTRL and V
Hello Marck,
Thursday, July 18, 2002, 1:37:00 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Just mark from (and including) BeginFilter to EndFilter, Ctrl-C to
MDP> copy the text, open the sorting office Incoming Mail filters, click
MDP> into the list and Ctrl-V. The new filter will appear with all fields
MDP> setup for
Hey Marck,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62/Beta1)' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 8:49:52 AM.
MDP> TB wraps *on view*. If you "view source" of the original message,
MDP> you will see the line without wrapping.
MDP> TB has to wrap on vie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tim,
@18 July 2002, 08:27 -0400 (13:27 UK time) Tim Musson [TM] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone:
MDP>> By removing the space after the "ReplyTemplate:" title TB won't be
MDP>> able to wrap the line.
TM> In
Hey Marck,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62/Beta1)' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 8:24:34 AM.
MDP>
ReplyTemplate:%CC\3D\[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]\22\0D\0AYou\20are\20writing\20to\20the\20wrong\20address.\0D\0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Britt,
@18 July 2002, 14:12 +0200 (13:12 UK time) Britt Malka [BM] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Jonathan Angliss:
BM> I tried that, but my ReplyTemplate didn't work after that either.
BM> It is empty.
Let's try this again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi St,
@18 July 2002, 13:41 +0200 (12:41 UK time) St - Musaic.Net [SMN] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Tee Bee Yoodle:
SMN> Be very careful when testing out those rules, people!
SMN> If you set the rule to send immediately
Dear Jonathan,
Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 1:53:50 PM you wrote:
JA> The line wrapping broke it I think. You may want to copy the whole thing into
JA> notepad, and delete the line break on the above snippet. The ReplyTemplate:
JA> should all be on one line, but TB! line wrapped it to several
Hey Jonathan,
My MUA believes 'Sylpheed version 0.7.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.9; )' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 7:53:50 AM.
JA> The line wrapping broke it I think.
Yep, the single wrap did it...
,- [ This should be on one line... ]
| Repl
Hi Marck,
on Thu, 18 Jul 2002 10:14:32 +0100GMT (18.07.02, 11:14 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MDP> If anyone affected could let them know, I would appreciate it. Let's
MDP> flood them with automated responses.
MDP> Here's a filter that may help to auto
Hi Tim,
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 07:36:28 -0400, you wrote:
> MDP> ReplyTemplate:
> MDP> OI!\20Postmaster!\0D\0A%CC\3D\[EMAIL PROTECTED];richard
> MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]\22\0D\0ADon\27t\20tell\20m
> MDP> e.\0D\0A\0D\0AI\20may\20be\20the\20originator\20but\20I\27m\20NOT\20the\
> MDP>
Be very careful when testing out those rules, people!
If you set the rule to send immediately upon rule satisfaction,
you might find yourself mailbombing the recipient each time you
bugtest the rule - thus you are spamming someone's account! :/
/ St
___
ext, open the sorting office Incoming Mail filters, click
into the list and Ctrl-V. The new filter will appear with all fields
setup for you.
This filter will mark read and move to trash any bounce messages from
Vizzavi and generate a reply to the Vizzavi po
Hey Marck,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.62/Beta1)' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 6:59:34 AM.
MDP> Here's an update to the filter that includes the message headers
MDP> for their benefit (I already heard back from one of the
MDP> directo
On Thursday, July 18, 2002, 5:14 AM, you wrote:
MDP> Here's a filter that may help to automate the process ;-).
MDP> BeginFilter
MDP> Name: Vizzavi Mail Administrator
MDP> Active: 1
MDP> Source: \\Marck\Inbox
MDP> Target: \\Marck\Trash
MDP> CopyFolder: none
MDP> MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
@18 July 2002, 10:14 +0100 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TB User
Discussion list:
MDP> Here's a filter that may help to automate the process ;-).
Here's an update to the filter that includes the m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi T'Buddlers,
Any of you (and there are many) getting bounce messages from the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - sorry, but it's not our fault. It's theirs!
If anyone affected could let them know, I would appreciate it. Let's
flood them with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jernej,
On 08 February 2002 at 21:54:47 +0100 (which was 20:54 where I live)
Jernej Simonèiè wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP>> If any of you start getting the following bounce messages...
> How can
Hello Jernej,
On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 9:54:47 PM you wrote in
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
MDP>> If any of you start getting the following bounce messages...
JS> How can they "bounce" the messages half a year after they were sent? :)
With a
Hello Marck,
08. februar 2002, 18:15:06, you wrote:
MDP> If any of you start getting the following bounce messages...
How can they "bounce" the messages half a year after they were sent? :)
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467
[T
Hello Marck!
On Friday, February 8, 2002 at 6:15:06 PM you wrote:
> ... please just delete them and ignore it. I have written to the
> runbox postmaster to complain - it's not our fault! OTOH, if you write
> to runbox too and demand that they configure their servers correctly,
> that wouldn't be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings Bat Fans,
If any of you start getting the following bounce messages...
,- [ runbox bounce message sample ]
| This message was created automatically by mail delivery software
| (Exim).
|
| A message that you sent could not be delivered
40 matches
Mail list logo
