On 15-04-2001 at 05:38, Thomas kindly wrote:
>> moi:
> Douglas:
KS>> Gouglas, we were joking. Seriously.
> "Gouglas"? Oh well. What's that stuff you're smoking?
Ordinary tobacco. I already privately apologised to Douglas.
>>> Do you have the necessary expert participation lined up?
> Yes, in
Hallo Karin,
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 01:48:54 +0200 GMT (15/04/2001, 07:48 +0800 GMT),
Karin Spaink wrote:
T> The moderators are doing too good a job - would mutiny be an option?
KS>>> Collect the e-mail addresses of all frequent posters and
KS>>> start a competing list on my mailserver?
[and
On 15-04-2001 at 01:36, Douglas Hinds kindly wrote:
> Hello Karin & others on this TB! list & following this thread,
T The moderators are doing too good a job - would mutiny be an option?
ACM>>> And how would you go about doing that? Mail *bombing* us???
KS>> Collect the e-mail addresses
Hello Karin & others on this TB! list & following this thread,
Saturday, April 14, 2001, you contributed to an OT interchange that
went like this:
T>>> The moderators are doing too good a job - would mutiny be an option?
ACM>> And how would you go about doing that? Mail *bombing* us???
KS>
On 14-04-2001 at 22:51, Marck D. Pearlstone kindly wrote:
> Hi Karin,
T The moderators are doing too good a job - would mutiny be an option?
>>> And how would you go about doing that? Mail *bombing* us???
KS>> Collect the e-mail addresses of all frequent posters and
KS>> start a competing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Karin,
On 14 April 2001 at 21:54:02 +0200 (which was 20:54 where I live)
Karin Spaink wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points:
T>>> The moderators are doing too good a job - would mutiny be an option?
>> And how would you go about doi
On 14-04-2001 at 20:50, A Curtis Martin kindly wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 01:46:08 +0800, Thomas graced us with these comments:
T>> The moderators are doing too good a job - would mutiny be an option?
> And how would you go about doing that? Mail *bombing* us???
Collect the e-mail addresses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001 01:46:08 +0800, Thomas graced us with these comments:
ACM>> Now we know your true motives for disagreeing with Marck's
ACM>> sentiments. :=)
T> The moderators are doing too good a job - would mutiny be an option?
And how would y
Hallo Allie,
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 06:29:50 -0500 GMT (14/04/2001, 19:29 +0800 GMT),
A Curtis Martin wrote:
T>> I haven't seen a good flame on this list for months! :-Þ
ACM> Now we know your true motives for disagreeing with Marck's sentiments. :=)
The moderators are doing too good a job - would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 13:54:19 +0800, Thomas wrote these comments:
«--snip--»
T> And, being as voyeuristic as I am, I love to read messages that were
T> meant to go by PM, but were inadvertedly copied to the list. It almost
T> always guarantees so
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:43:08 +0100 GMT (14/04/2001, 02:43 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
DH>> The operative word is "sensible".
MDP> The operative word *is* sensible.
The *operative* word is sensible. You operate your program, it
will do what you tell it. It makes sense.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 8:43:08 PM you wrote:
> And, no sooner do we start discussing the topic than a user makes a
> post to two addresses bearing no relationship to this list and yet one
> of those addresses is that of the list.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
On 13 April 2001 at 18:52:43 +0100 (which was 18:52 where I live)
Adam wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone and made these points:
MDP>>%TO=""%TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
^^
A> I used this (thanks) for a list I am on, it wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
On 13 April 2001 at 18:32:22 +0200 (which was 17:32 where I live)
Dierk Haasis wrote to Thomas and made these points:
DH> I think I once described it on list not so long ago. The operative
DH> word is "sensible".
The operative word *is*
Hallo Dierk,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:42:15 +0200 GMT (14/04/2001, 00:42 +0800 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH> Another side question bugging me for some time now: Are the macro
DH> names case sensitive?
No.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
The severity of the
Hello Marck,
On Friday, April 13, 2001, 12:14:17 AM, you wrote:
MDP> The only way to do this is to create edit the Folder properties and
MDP> create a Reply template for the folder which includes the
MDP>%TO=""%TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I used this (thanks) for a list I am on, it works b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello David!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 8:31:10 AM you wrote:
> I have a list like this as well. My solution is to put the following in a
> folder level template for that list.
> %to="" %to="%OFROMNAME on [group name] <%OTOADDR>"
Another side qu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 4:35:38 AM you wrote:
> That's the risk. One should take a look at the TO header before
> hitting "send". It requires an IQ above that of bread, which should be
> no problem for anybody who has grown out of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck!
On Friday, April 13, 2001 at 1:14:17 AM you wrote:
>%TO=""%TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Just out of curiosity: Why not *%TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"*?
- --
Dierk Haasis
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
On April 13, 2001, at 12:01:59 AM, Ottar Grimstad wrote:
> You just taught me about Address Book templates. I had not discovered
> these. To have my reply template here for a well behaved list seems OK,
> but the conveniance of just highlighting the folder and start a new
> message will be lost i
Hello Marck,
Friday, April 13, 2001, 1:14:17 AM, you wrote:
MDP> responsibly (everyone here knows about my aversion to folder level
MDP> templates - heck, I belong to a couple of lists that need this done
MDP> and I can't bring myself to do it).
I am a newcomer to the list and to Bat, and lear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hail sd
On 12 April 2001 at 17:56:29 -0500 (which was 23:56 where I live) sd ha
scritto made the following points
> I have a folder, into which all my mail from a mailing list goes to.
> When I reply to a message, instead of getting the email addres
On Thursday, April 12, 2001 at 6:14:17 PM you wrote:
> There. I feel like I've done my duty. I've explained the solution
> responsibly (everyone here knows about my aversion to folder level
> templates - heck, I belong to a couple of lists that need this done
> and I can't bring myself to do it).
Hi Marck,
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001 00:14:17 +0100GMT (13/04/2001, 07:14 +0800GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> macro. This is *very* *very* dangerous
No it isn't. "*very* *very* dangerous" is drinking and driving.
"*very* *very* dangerous" is experimenting with Molotov cocktails. But
here, we ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi sd,
On 12 April 2001 at 17:56:29 -0500 (which was 23:56 where I live) sd
wrote to The Bat! Mailing List and made these points:
s> Can I do something to change, for this one folder, the address that
s> ALL replies go to by default?
Yes you can,
I have a folder, into which all my mail from a mailing list goes to.
When I reply to a message, instead of getting the email address of the
list, I get the email address of the person who sent the message.
Can I do something to change, for this one folder, the address that
ALL replies go to by de
26 matches
Mail list logo
