Re: Ctrl-F4 (was: Re: Message not intended for posting on TBUDL)

2000-01-22 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:43:50 +0100, Jast wrote: > This depends on whether you have the TBUDL templates based on the > address book or as a folder template. If you use the address book then > that template will be overridden when you reply to sender. You're right. My UDL templates are

Re: Ctrl-F4 (was: Re: Message not intended for posting on TBUDL)

2000-01-22 Thread Jast
Morning Allie Martin, > The next thing is that Ctrl-F4 *does* work as it should with that > macro in the reply template. I just tried it. :) This depends on whether you have the TBUDL templates based on the address book or as a folder template. If you use the address book then that te

Re: Ctrl-F4 (was: Re: Message not intended for posting on TBUDL)

2000-01-21 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000 12:05:03 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: >>> off-list reply is Ctrl-F4. It works every time. Get used to it and >>> avoid embarrassing stains - I mean - incidents. ;-) MG>> Careful with your suggestions. This doesn't work when somebody, such MG>> as me, has '%TO=""%TO="TBUDL <

Re: Ctrl-F4 (was: Re: Message not intended for posting on TBUDL)

2000-01-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Markus, On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:01:39 +0100 GMT (22.01.2000, 01:01 +0800 GMT), Markus Gloede wrote: >> off-list reply is Ctrl-F4. It works every time. Get used to it and >> avoid embarrassing stains - I mean - incidents. ;-) MG> Careful with your suggestions. This doesn't work when somebod

Ctrl-F4 (was: Re: Message not intended for posting on TBUDL)

2000-01-21 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, On Friday, January 21, 2000, 3:29:12 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: > off-list reply is Ctrl-F4. It works every time. Get used to it and > avoid embarrassing stains - I mean - incidents. ;-) Careful with your suggestions. This doesn't work when somebody, such as me, has '%TO=""%TO="TBUDL <[