Re: Extracting address and cgi- form-inputs out of message body

2001-11-20 Thread Thomas F
Hello Marck, On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 12:56:39 + GMT (20/11/2001, 20:56 +0800 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: DH>> Since I am always curious and interested in the special field of DH>> spam "he" sent to the list, I went to the URL. As you have seen in DH>> the message, it wasn't an name domain, s

Re: NO SEX - Extracting address and cgi- form-inputs out of message body

2001-11-20 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi wilhelm, On 20 November 2001 at 13:54:07 [GMT+0100] (which was 12:54 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to Peter Palmreuther and made these points: PP>> So all in all I've mixed feelings about Wilhelm as the spammer or not. watod> Its not a

Re: Extracting address and cgi- form-inputs out of message body

2001-11-20 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dierk, On 20 November 2001 at 12:34:16 [GMT+0100] (which was 11:34 where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote to Peter Palmreuther and made these points: >> So all in all I've mixed feelings about Wilhelm as the spammer or not. DH> I have not - for the mo

Re[2]: NO SEX - Extracting address and cgi- form-inputs out of message body

2001-11-20 Thread wilhelm . alm
Hello Peter, Tuesday, November 20, 2001, 11:41:58 AM, you wrote: PP> Hello Carsten, PP> On Dienstag, 20. November 2001 at 09:33:49 you wrote (at least in part): >>> It may all be very harmless, but actually I would - for the moment - >>> deny you any support as it looks like you are a spammer. PP

Re: Extracting address and cgi- form-inputs out of message body

2001-11-20 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Peter! On Dienstag, 20. November 2001 at 11:41:58 you wrote: > So all in all I've mixed feelings about Wilhelm as the spammer or not. I have not - for the moment. My reply to his message (the legitimate one) was intended to get a reaction fr

Re: Extracting address and cgi- form-inputs out of message body

2001-11-20 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Carsten, On Dienstag, 20. November 2001 at 09:33:49 you wrote (at least in part): >> It may all be very harmless, but actually I would - for the moment - >> deny you any support as it looks like you are a spammer. CT> look into the headers (at least message-id) of both mails! First: Mess

Re: Extracting address and cgi- form-inputs out of message body

2001-11-20 Thread Carsten Thönges
Hi Dierk, > It may all be very harmless, but actually I would - for the moment - > deny you any support as it looks like you are a spammer. look into the headers (at least message-id) of both mails! I don't think Wilhelm is a spammer. I can hardly imagine that these were the links to his cgi -

Re: Extracting address and cgi- form-inputs out of message body

2001-11-20 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello wilhelm! On Dienstag, 20. November 2001 at 08:05:55 you wrote: > Hello tbudl, > I get a lot of mails from a cgi program of another aplication containing form >field > inputs in the body. E.g. Two messages from you on list. This on

Extracting address and cgi- form-inputs out of message body

2001-11-19 Thread wilhelm . alm
Hello tbudl, I get a lot of mails from a cgi program of another aplication containing form field inputs in the body. E.g. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Name: Visitor Abc Interest: Car Color: Red I am interested to send an "autoresponded" message to the vi