Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote:
Can you guys suggest a better alternative?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local
proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy...
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote:
Can you guys suggest a better alternative?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local
proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy...
But are you checking more than six email
Hi admin,
Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 11:51:47 PM, you wrote:
Can you guys suggest a better alternative?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net - its not a TB plugin, its a local
proxy. But it rawks! :-) Using it for 3 months now, 98% accuracy...
aacu But are you checking more than
I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of
spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about
10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt
just can't do the job or the spammers are outwitting it. Either way,
I'm not prepared to
I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of
spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about
10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt
just can't do the job or the spammers are outwitting it. Either way,
I'm not
Hello Code,
Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:51:47 PM, you wrote:
C2 I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of
C2 spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about
C2 10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt
C2 just can't do
Hello Code2,
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 5:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C2 I started training BayesIt 0.5.9 a few months ago with thousands of
C2 spam and non-spam messages. Despite this, it's catching only about
C2 10%. I continue to mark the missed stuff as junk, but either BayesIt
C2
7 matches
Mail list logo