This message: 21/09/2000 09:17 GMT.
Hello Allie,
A reminder of what A ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
20 September 2000 at 17:16:29 GMT -0500
ACM Loads a stuff about Little Robots.
Thanks you very much Allie. My kids were getting fed up with The Three
Little Bears. I've printed out you
On Wednesday, September 20, 2000, jbelk wrote:
Thanks to all the good people here that explained filtering to me last
night. I found that my mental image of how filters worked was
completely different from reality. In order to understand them I came
up with an analogy that may or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 06:31:05 -0400, Paula Ford wrote:
PF I'm glad it's clearer to you, but I don't like the analogy of multiple
PF robots who examine the email. I prefer to think of it this way, using
PF moving messages to folders to illustrate.
PF
Thanks to all the good people here that explained filtering to me last
night. I found that my mental image of how filters worked was
completely different from reality. In order to understand them I came
up with an analogy that may or may not be completely accurate. Feel
free to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:56:28 -0600, jbelk wrote:
j There are actually as many robots as filters I've created. Each of
j these little robots examine all the mail to see if any of it suits
j what their defined job. If so, they grab it.
Exactly. :-)
Hi jbelk,
I like the image of little robots marching to your orders, to and from
the mailbox, presenting you with little packets of letters, tearing up
junk mail... :)
but your analogy isn't quite right. Let's imagine that there are as
many robots as there are filters. The way you describe
Hey Havivah,
Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 4:34:02 PM, you wrote:
Havivah Hi jbelk,
Havivah I like the image of little robots marching to your orders, to and from
Havivah the mailbox, presenting you with little packets of letters, tearing up
Havivah junk mail... :)
Havivah but your analogy
7 matches
Mail list logo
