Alexander S. Kunz @ 9/06/2005 3:35:37 PM
"Mod: Cut mark (was: I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail
HTML?)"
> Interesting. My signature delimiter in Outlook never works. Maybe because I
> send via Exchange server.
Yes. There is a setting in the Exchange serve
Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else,
on 06-Sep-2005 at 22:01 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
> I'm sure no one who does tech here did any patching, and I have a working
> delimiter in my signature block in Outlook 2003. I virtually never use
> it, but just tested now because I was pretty sure it d
On Tuesday, September 6, 2005, 2:37:58 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
>> doesn't the have to be a space after the two dashes, and wasn't it
>> missing?
> Yes. Thats often the problem with mailers that are completely unaware of
> the sig delimiter function. You cannot create a working sig delimiter
Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else,
on 06-Sep-2005 at 19:13 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
>>> --
>>> Wil
>> hehe
> doesn't the have to be a space after the two dashes, and wasn't it
> missing?
Yes. Thats often the problem with mailers that are completely unaware of
the sig delimiter function
On Tuesday, September 6, 2005, 11:47:19 AM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> And adding a manual cutmark doesn't work either. ;-)
>> --
>> Wil
> hehe
doesn't the have to be a space after the two dashes, and wasn't it
missing?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 3
Hello Wil & everyone else,
on 06-Sep-2005 at 12:10 you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Sorry all members. I've used my webmail to post quickly. I forget that there
> is
> no template with Webmail as with my TB ! ;-)
And adding a manual cutmark doesn't work either. ;-)
> --
> Wil
hehe
--
Best
Selon Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please include a signature delimiter in your messages.
Sorry all members. I've used my webmail to post quickly. I forget that there is
no template with Webmail as with my TB ! ;-)
--
Wil
Current version i
Hallo Wil,
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 09:37:14 +0200GMT (6-9-2005, 9:37 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
W> I could already answer HTML mails before the version 3.51 and 3.60 and that
goes
W> very well ! I don't understand why TB has changed...
W>
W> C
Selon "Alexander S. Kunz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> You can answer with HTML to HTML messages, now don't get hasty! ;-)
>
>
I could already answer HTML mails before the version 3.51 and 3.60 and that goes
very well ! I don't understand why TB has changed...
___
uotation and with a wretched blue
> back, and the column of right-hand side with the text of origin itself!
> Difficult to make worse like mail of answer. My correspondents wonder
> what I have fun! I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?
You can answer with HTML to
Hello WilWilWil,
On Saturday, September 3, 2005, you wrote:
W> when I answer a mail which was with format HTML, the text of
W> origin quoted is in a dreadful table HTML with 2 cells. One on the
W> left containing the character > quotation and with a wretched blue
W> back, and the column of right
elf! Difficult to make
worse like mail of answer. My correspondents wonder what I have fun! I
believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?
--
WilWilWil
:flag-france:
TB 3.60.07
BayesIt! 0.8.4
Windows XP
Service Pack 2
Current version
12 matches
Mail list logo
