Hi Dave,
The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 17:08 my local
time;
I'm using TBird's filtering, and while there are things I miss about
TB!'s more advanced filtering, at least TBird's filtering works smoothly
with IMAP, which last I tried TB!, the filtering with IMAP was
Peter Fjelsten @ 2005-Jan-20 2:37:52 PM
I have returned mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally, most developers consider it either bad taste or a violation
of open-source licenses to look at code and then re-implement the
same functionality.
Maybe they could have a small sneak peek... :)
I'm
ON Thursday, January 20, 2005, 8:30:10 PM, you wrote:
C Also, Thunderbird is written in C++; The Bat! is written in Delphi.
Chris,
I believe on of the changes in version 3 was that they have re-written TB! in C+
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Friday, January 21, 2005, 1:13:29 PM, Gerard wrote:
I believe on of the changes in version 3 was that they have re-written TB! in
C+
Nope, PEid says it's Borland Delphi 6.0-7.0
--
Best regards,
Buiculescu Virgil mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
The original quoted text below was written on 19/01/2005 22:33 my local
time;
I tried Thunderbird for about two months. I am back to the bat.
Great program.
I must confess, I've been using Thunderbird for about 2-3 months now.
The main reason for this is that I personally find IMAP support
Hi Roman Katzer,
On 19/01/2005 11:13 PM, you wrote:
I'm curious. What do you see as the most important advantages and
disadvantages of both clients? What do you like most and least about both?
My sentiments are based on my being a full IMAP user:
ThunderBird is simpler so more attention is
Hi Chris Weaven,
On 20/01/2005 04:29 AM, you wrote:
Obviously I miss lots of features within TB!, especially templates and
certain aspects of filtering, but I'm able to carry out server side
filtering which has cushioned the blow somewhat.
I forgot about filtering. How could I?! :)
The
Chris Weaven said the following on 01/20/2005 10:52:
If I were to be totally honest here, the only thing I'm really missing
from TB! is templates. Working with Thunderbird and IMAP with server
side filtering for a few months now has made me realise that I'm not as
reliant on TB! as I thought I
Allie,
On 20-01-2005 17:24, you [A] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A Keyboard navigation is nice and easy. I hit 'n' to move to the next
A unread message. It's very awkward leaving the letter 'n' to hit
A 'CTRL+]'.
Do as I do. Use PowerPro to get all the different keyboard shortcuts to
respond
Peter Fjelsten [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2005-Jan-20 at Thu PM 12:17:51 EST,
wrote:
Yes. But it should be pretty easy for RitLabs to look at the source for
Thunderbird (it being open) and pore over what _they_ have done to get
it all to work as well (?) as it does. :)
It may be possible for Rit
Chris,
On 20-01-2005 20:30, you [C] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
C Finally, most developers consider it either bad taste or a violation
C of open-source licenses to look at code and then re-implement the
C same functionality.
Maybe they could have a small sneak peek... :)
--
greeting Best
Hi Peter Fjelsten,
On 20/01/2005 12:17 PM, you wrote:
Do as I do. Use PowerPro to get all the different keyboard shortcuts to
respond to '.
That works well until I wish to really do a quick search and instead of
'n' appearing as it should in the quick search string entry field, I
keep going
Allie,
On 20-01-2005 22:09, you [A] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do as I do. Use PowerPro to get all the different keyboard shortcuts
to respond to '.
A That works well until I wish to really do a quick search and instead of
A 'n' appearing as it should in the quick search string entry
On Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 5:14:52 PM [GMT -0500], Peter
Fjelsten wrote:
I think you may misunderstand (I must have been unclear). I have set
the key ' to move to the next unread message (PowerPro translates
this to the different keystrokes I have set in TB!). This does not
interfere
TB UDL ERS,
I tried Thunderbird for about two months. I am back to the bat.
Great program.
--
Michael L. Wilson
The Bat: 3.0.1.33
Windows XP version:5.1 [Build:2600] Service Pack 2
Link to my public key: http://snipurl.com/bevn
Current
Hello Michael,
on Wednesday, 19. January 2005, at 14:33:42 [GMT -0800] you wrote
regarding I have returned:
I tried Thunderbird for about two months. I am back to the bat.
Great program.
Nice to have you back. Back to the roots :)
--
Ciao
Thomas
Using: TheBat! 3.0.2.10
System: Windows
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 2:33:42 PM, you wrote:
I am back to the bat.
Missed your long signatures. ;-)
--
Thanks,
Terry
Using the Bat! 3.0.1 RC4
under Windows XP Service Pack 2 2600
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using
On Wednesday, January 19, 2005 at 5:33:42 PM [GMT -0500], Michael L.
Wilson wrote:
I tried Thunderbird for about two months. I am back to the bat.
Great program.
I was using ThunderBird pretty much exclusively for a couple months
myself. I've since started using TB! at home and ThunderBird at
Hi Allie,
On Wednesday, January 19, 2005, 19:49:19, Allie Martin wrote:
One things for sure. My fluent use of ThunderBird has opened up my
eyes to a lot of problems with TB! and the reverse certainly/obviously
applies as well.
I'm curious. What do you see as the most important advantages and
19 matches
Mail list logo
