Re: IMAP: sync options

2005-01-07 Thread Allie Martin
On Friday, January 07, 2005 at 6:44:16 AM [GMT -0500], Tim wrote: > But does that actually work in practice? In my experience, I cannot > retrieve text separately to attachments. When I use it, it seems to work here. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . Ambition is the last refuge of the failure.

Re: IMAP: sync options

2005-01-07 Thread Tim
On Friday, 7 January 2005, Allie Martin wrote: AM> Headers and Text, is retrieval of headers and text without AM> attachments, a more bandwidth friendly option. AM> Full sync retrieves everything, i.e., headers, text and attachments. But does that actually work in practice? In my experience, I c

Re: IMAP: sync options

2005-01-07 Thread Allie Martin
On Friday, January 07, 2005 at 12:12:53 AM [GMT -0500], Ken Green wrote: > When syncing IMAP folders, what is the difference between "Headers and > text" and "Full syncronization?" Headers and Text, is retrieval of headers and text without attachments, a more bandwidth friendly option. Full sync

IMAP: sync options

2005-01-07 Thread ken green
When syncing IMAP folders, what is the difference between "Headers and text" and "Full syncronization?" -- Best regards, ken mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.si