IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

First, Is TB IMAP known to be buggy? I've done a small amount of testing and there has been erratic behaviour, TB freezing and confusion. I want to check my mail at a remote location and achieve the following : * Messages and my replies to them end up at my primary non-remote machine * My pr

Re: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

Hi tb, tko> First, Is TB IMAP known to be buggy? I've done a small amount of tko> testing and there has been erratic behaviour, TB freezing and confusion. Yes the IMAP at my end, while not exactly buggy, is nevertheless unsatisfactory, at least in terms of the regular filtering functions (they d

Re: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

David, On 10-11-2003 22:46, you [D] wrote in : D> Yes the IMAP at my end, while not exactly buggy, is nevertheless D> unsatisfactory, at least in terms of the regular filtering functions D> (they don't work) Ah. OK. Been wondering about that! Has anybody filed a bug report?

Re: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

Hi Batpersons, On or about, Monday, November 10, 2003, 5:01:14 PM, we have reason to believe that [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tko> Second, is there any other Bayesian spam plugin for TB? Are any planned? tko> What about non-Bayesian spam plugins? tko> I dropped K9 in favor of BayesIt (because I wa

Re: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

Hi Nick, On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, at 17:37:51 [GMT+] (which was Wed, 4:37:51 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > Select some spam and use Specials, Mark as Junk; select some > non-spam, and use Specials, Mark as not Junk. Where should the "Junk" folder be placed? Or should it be installed a

Re: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

Hi Nick, On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, at 19:11:27 [GMT+] (which was Wed, 6:11:27 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > Hope this makes sense. Sure does! Thanks. BTW would a "white list" also be a helpful thing? Is there such a plug in? -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v2.01

Re[2]: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

Hello Nick, Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 2:07:15 AM, you wrote: NG> Hi Batpersons, NG> On or about, Monday, November 10, 2003, 5:01:14 PM, we have NG> reason to believe that [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NG> a new version from my open source plugin is ready and hopefully NG> working. Just download the

Re[3]: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

Hi Batpersons, On or about, Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 3:15:27 PM, we have reason to believe that Stuart Cuddy wrote: SC> I downloaded the program and installed it in TB, but how do I make it SC> scan anything? Select some spam and use Specials, Mark as Junk; select some non-spam, and use Sp

Re[4]: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

Hello Nick, Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 11:37:51 AM, you wrote: NG> Hi Batpersons, NG> On or about, Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 3:15:27 PM, we have NG> reason to believe that Stuart Cuddy wrote: SC>> I downloaded the program and installed it in TB, but how do I make it SC>> scan anything? NG> S

Re[2]: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

Hi Batpersons, On or about, Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 6:36:08 PM, we have reason to believe that John Phillips wrote: JP> Where should the "Junk" folder be placed? JP> Or should it be installed automatically? (Because I do not have it!) JP> I presume by marking mail as "Junk", it is automat

Re[2]: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives

Hi Batpersons, On or about, Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 7:51:32 PM, we have reason to believe that John Phillips wrote: JP> BTW would a "white list" also be a helpful thing? That's a subject of much debate; if you're able to keep it up-to-date, I'd say yes. I don't use one myself: I'm not disc

Mod: Cut mark (was: IMAP Status, BayesIt alternatives)

Hi Stuart, @11-Nov-2003, 09:15 -0600 (11-Nov 15:15 UK time) Stuart Cuddy said to Nick: > -- Best regards, Stuart mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply.