Re: IMAP rules ..

Clive Taylor wrote: > Tell you what. Go to Ritlab's website and try and find references to TB > and IMAP. While you're there , try and find the forum, too. How about finding a way to report bugs? Anyone see a link to Bug Tracker on the RitLabs site? What's going on with RitLabs? Lots of unhapp

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 11:07:12 AM, you wrote: CT> This is straight from FM's FAQ - it's a one-off set up.. Thank you! Apparently I didn't read far enough into the FAQ ... sorry ... So that might be workable .. I might have to do some tinkering here. Lynn TBv 2.04.7 Windowsv 5 -- [EMAIL PROT

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 7:57:28 AM, you wrote: PF> TB! filtering engine is being rewritten as it PF> does not work for IMAP at PF> the moment. PF> Watch coming releases... I will .. thanks Lynn TBv 2.04.7 Windowsv 5 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed* * *

Re: IMAP rules ..

Lynn, On 04-05-2004 16:44, you [LT] wrote in : LT> The thing that's frustrating me is the inability to make folders to LT> filter the mail ... Mulberry seems to let you do that, Tbird didn't. LT> It's really impractical for me to use an account for anything much LT> if I ca

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:33:40 PM, you wrote: >> do FastMail and MailSnare actually forward the mail out? If so, why >> can't it be forwarded to a POP account in TB? CT> Have a look at FastMail's features. Yes, I did that yesterday after I'd posted .. I often do things backwards :-) CT> Go to

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:42:50 AM, you wrote: CT> I've just mentioned to Jim that FastMail or CT> Mailsnare offer extremely CT> good POP, IMAP and forwarding facilities for external mail. well, I'm looking at Mulberry, but ... :-( I'm really not keen on web interfaces; do FastMail and MailSnare a

Re[3]: IMAP rules ..

Monday, May 3, 2004, 9:52:21 AM, you wrote: JL> I just recently set up an IMAP account with the smtp (outgoing) JL> specified, and I forward the IMAP incoming to a JL> POP3 account, and set up a JL> filter to change the colo(u)r option for the mail from that account. JL> So I read the mail via a

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

Sunday, May 2, 2004, 7:47:33 AM, you wrote: CT> Hi Dave, >> nothing else I've tried comes close to TB! for most features, but IMAP >> has become essential, and perhaps I'll need to compromise in other >> areas to get acceptable IMAP support. CT> Exactly my conclusion. I've lost patience recently

Re: IMAP rules ..

Hello Marek, Saturday, May 1, 2004, 5:00:17 PM, you wrote: > new filtering system is under development and Stef is preparing it for > new beta serie. Virtual folders were developed by other Ritlabs > programmer, filtering system was not delayed by implementing them. That's good to hear. T

Re: IMAP rules ..

Hello Clive, Saturday, May 1, 2004, 4:02:23 PM, you wrote: > Tell you what. Go to Ritlab's website and try and find references to TB > and IMAP. While you're there , try and find the forum, too. As I recall > there were large numbers of postings scathing about TB's abilities in > that area. > It

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

Hello all, Saturday, May 1, 2004, Dave Gorman wrote: >> do incoming rules work automatically when using IMAP and TheBat? > No. It has been promised, but the timeline is anyone's guess. At this > point it seems the virtual folders are a higher priority. new filtering system is under development

Re: IMAP rules ..

Hello Jody, Saturday, May 1, 2004, 11:13:22 AM, you wrote: >>> do incoming rules work automatically when using IMAP and TheBat? DG>> No. It has been promised, but the timeline is anyone's guess. At this DG>> point it seems the virtual folders are a higher priority. > Sad ... because I for one

Re[2]: IMAP rules ..

E-Mail Message ~~ From: Dave Gorman Date: Saturday, May 01, 2004 at 7:41 AM Subject: Re: IMAP rules .. _ _\/_ o/\o DG> Hello Jody, DG> Friday, April 30, 2004, 8:17:53 PM, you wrote: >> do in

Re: IMAP rules ..

Hello Jody, Friday, April 30, 2004, 8:17:53 PM, you wrote: > do incoming rules work automatically when using IMAP and TheBat? No. It has been promised, but the timeline is anyone's guess. At this point it seems the virtual folders are a higher priority. -- Dave Using The Bat! v2.10 on Windo

Re: IMAP rules ..

> do incoming rules work automatically when using IMAP and TheBat? seems not... -- Samson, using Agent newsreader Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html