Hi!
Recently, the internal picture viewer doesn't work anymore. Whenever I
want to view an attached picture, the progress bar appears and
finishes, but the picture isn't shown.
I can't remember if this issue first turned out after installing
version 1.36 - could this be the rea
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Wednesday, October 13, 1999, Christian Gassmann wrote about
Internal picture viewer:
CG> Recently, the internal picture viewer doesn't work anymore. Whenever I
CG> want to view an attached picture, the progress bar appears and
CG> finishes, but the
On Wednesday, October 13, 1999, 10:51, Christian Gassmann wrote:
> Recently, the internal picture viewer doesn't work anymore. Whenever I
> want to view an attached picture, the progress bar appears and
> finishes, but the picture isn't shown.
Hello Christian,
I cannot
Hi all,
On Wednesday, October 13, 1999, 4:17:50 AM (-5 GMT), Oleg scribbled:
> Just checked. I can't say it doesn't work anymore at all, but
> sometimes it doesn't show a picture, I haven't found a law yet.
> sometimes it seems to help if you leave messages and switch back to
Hi all,
On Wednesday, October 13, 1999, 3:40:19 PM (-5 GMT), Stan scribbled:
AM>> It displays .gif images OK but doesn't display .jpgs.
> Just found interesting thing:
> It shows jpegs when the message is in the Inbox, but once it is
> moved to a different folder it doesn't show up
Hi there!
On 13 Oct 99, at 16:19, Ali Martin wrote
about "Re: Internal picture viewer":
Hey, might this be a problem with ordinary/progressive JPEGs?
Maybe TB's internal viewer cannot display the latter type of the
format?
> > Just found interesting thing:
> >
Hi all,
On Wednesday, October 13, 1999, 5:27:15 PM (-5 GMT), Alexander scribbled:
> Hey, might this be a problem with ordinary/progressive JPEGs? Maybe
> TB's internal viewer cannot display the latter type of the format?
It could before.
>> I have no problems with .gif files.
>>
>> The probl
t 1999
> 13:17:09 +0400
> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 14:17:50 +0500
> From: Oleg Zalyalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.36) S/N C7060B67
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Organization: Global One
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello, Marck.
On Thursday, October 14, 1999, 11:00:59 AM, you wrote:
> On 14 October 1999 at 17:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
KR>> Can anyone tell me how the current thread got broken? Both Christian's
KR>> and Oleg's messages were composed using The Bat! However, Oleg's
KR>> In-Reply-To
Hi Ali,
Wednesday, October 13, 1999, 3:24:01 PM, you wrote:
AM> Hi all,
AM> On Wednesday, October 13, 1999, 4:17:50 AM (-5 GMT), Oleg scribbled:
>> Just checked. I can't say it doesn't work anymore at all, but
>> sometimes it doesn't show a picture, I haven't found a law yet.
>
Hi Ali,
Wednesday, October 13, 1999, 4:19:34 PM, you wrote:
AM>>> It displays .gif images OK but doesn't display .jpgs.
>> Just found interesting thing:
>> It shows jpegs when the message is in the Inbox, but once it is
>> moved to a different folder it doesn't show up anymore!
AM> I
Hi all!
>> Hey, might this be a problem with ordinary/progressive JPEGs? Maybe TB's
>> internal viewer cannot display the latter type of the format?
AM> It could before.
I noticed this bug after installing beta/10. It is not reproduced in beta/9 -
probably, just by accidence...
I played with
On 14 October 1999 at 17:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
KR> Can anyone tell me how the current thread got broken? Both Christian's
KR> and Oleg's messages were composed using The Bat! However, Oleg's
KR> In-Reply-To somehow appears to have been mangled, thus breaking the
KR> thread.
Let me
At Thursday, October 14, 1999, 7:00:59 PM, Marck mashed together those heresies:
>>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MDP> Here's Oleg's message ID
>>> In-reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MDP> It seems that he is replying to a message generated within his o
On 14 October 1999 at 18:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
M> At Thursday, October 14, 1999, 7:00:59 PM, Marck mashed together those heresies:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MDP>> Here's Oleg's message ID
In-reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MDP>>
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, October 14, 1999, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote about
Internal picture viewer:
MDP> While this is correct and that it is true that TB does not do
MDP> this correctly, I am dead right that Oleg's server is throwing
MDP> another sp
(About time the subject was corrected)
I wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how the current thread got broken? Both Christian's
> and Oleg's messages were composed using The Bat! However, Oleg's
> In-Reply-To somehow appears to have been mangled, thus breaking the
> thread.
FWIW, I just downloaded
Hi all,
On Thursday, October 14, 1999, 1:54:50 PM (-5 GMT), Keith scribbled:
> OTOH, Stan's 'Re[2]' and MaXxX's 'Re[2]' both start new threads in
> Agent. I think The Bat! is the only email client that handles these.
> Are there others?
This is why %Singlere is such a handy template macro. ;-b
Hello, Ali.
On Thursday, October 14, 1999, 3:30:14 PM, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> On Thursday, October 14, 1999, 1:54:50 PM (-5 GMT), Keith scribbled:
>> OTOH, Stan's 'Re[2]' and MaXxX's 'Re[2]' both start new threads in
>> Agent. I think The Bat! is the only email client that handles these.
>> Ar
Hello Keith Russell,
On Friday, October 15, 1999, 1:54:50 AM you told us:
[ ... ]
KR> OTOH, Stan's 'Re[2]' and MaXxX's 'Re[2]' both start new threads in
KR> Agent. I think The Bat! is the only email client that handles these.
KR> Are there others?
Yupe, latest Becky does.
--
- syafril -
***
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Thursday, October 14, 1999, 2:47:18 PM, Stan wrote:
[snip]
> BTW, Netscape Messenger handled all these things correctly, it broke
> though in some other places where Bat didn't, but in general threads are
> working better there.
Interesting to know.
> Probabl
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Thursday, October 14, 1999, 8:58:29 PM, Syafril wrote:
KR>> OTOH, Stan's 'Re[2]' and MaXxX's 'Re[2]' both start new threads in
KR>> Agent. I think The Bat! is the only email client that handles these.
KR>> Are there others?
> Yupe, latest Becky does.
Really? I miss
On Thursday, October 14, 1999, 8:54:50 PM, Keith Russell wrote:
> OTOH, Stan's 'Re[2]' and MaXxX's 'Re[2]' both start new threads in
> Agent. I think The Bat! is the only email client that handles these.
> Are there others?
Now this not anymore related to TheBat, but as many of us still use
Agen
Hi Keith,
Thursday, October 14, 1999, 1:54:50 PM, you wrote:
KR> FWIW, I just downloaded these messages to Agent, and confirmed what I
KR> already suspected: Agent caught this and displayed Oleg's message as a
KR> followup to Christian's. I'm guessing this is because Agent using
KR> Subject when
24 matches
Mail list logo
