...
AM> This is a nice way of dealing with it. I set PGP to wrap at the
AM> same line length as TB!. I however reformat any material that I quote.
AM> If you don't necessarily reformat quoted text then the quoted material
AM> could get terribly wrapped by PGP upon sending messages. I'm se
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000 15:06:39 +0100, Miguel Anjo wrote:
MA> I noted now that none of you use the justified paragraph. Why?
MA> I just think is a great feature and makes the messages much
MA> more "beautiful". And also, many people ask me how I do it, and then
MA> I show then The Bat!.
Jus
On Saturday, July 01, 2000 at 9:06 AM or thereabouts, Miguel Anjo
wrote the following about Justified paragraphs:
Miguel> I noted now that none of you use the justified paragraph. Why?
Because it cannot be properly used within TB! Justification looks
nice in publishing, but can look hideous
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000 13:43:05 -0500, Chuck Mattsen wrote:
CM> My experience is that it can look "beautiful" at times, horrid at
CM> others. I don't really see why it was included as an option with
CM> the current font/editor situation. Ick.
Agreed. I'll certainly switch it on if I use a
AM> Justification really looks nice when a variable width font is
AM> used. With fixed width fonts, it can look a bit tacky because line
AM> length adjustments can only be made on a 'one or more' character width
AM> basis. The line lengths may be equal but inappropriate spaces between
A
5 matches
Mail list logo
