Hi all,
On Sunday, September 26, 1999, 12:44:43 AM (-5 GMT), Steve scribbled:
You missed the point. My point was that someone has a real problem,
which is off the norm, and you refuse to discuss it. Well then, don't.
But don't tell the author of that post, or the list, that this
shouldn't
Hallo Steve,
On Sunday, September 26, 1999, 2:35:13 PM, Steve Lamb wrote:
I wish to hear how you'd deal with his peculiar situation of having to
deal with spammers who seem to stupidly believe in quality and not
quantity.
SL I just press the delete key because any filtering would
Saturday, September 25, 1999, 11:39:27 PM, Thomas wrote:
SL I just press the delete key because any filtering would invariably cause
SL false-positives and a loss of mail.
Thank you! Now we have the solution to this problem and can end the
thread.
The thread would have ended two days
On Wednesday, September 22, 1999, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
We have now added a new dimension to TBUDL and TBBETA that will,
hopefully, add to its' usefulness. The TBUDL and TBBETA discussion
lists are now being archived in a public archive resource ...
Way cool, you guys. Thanks. Now I can
Thursday, September 23, 1999, 10:30:53 AM, Marck wrote:
There was a posting to the old list from Leif Gregory which detailed a
'Hard Core' solution to spam handling.
.. and here is the content of that missive (a bit big, but worth it).
Actually, it isn't. Bounces don't mean anything to
Hallo Marck,
On Friday, September 24, 1999, 1:30:53 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
TF The only spam filter I could think of is a kill filter for
TF messages addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd appreciate some tips.
MDP There was a posting to the old list from Leif Gregory which detailed a
MDP
Greetings fellow Battlers,
We have now added a new dimension to TBUDL and TBBETA that will,
hopefully, add to its' usefulness. The TBUDL and TBBETA discussion
lists are now being archived in a public archive resource at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We have also provided
a simplified
7 matches
Mail list logo