It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 21:18:00 GMT+0100 (which was 21:18
where I live) SyP wrote and spread these wise comments on "New 1.60
version: bug?":
S> mNewQT_QT_DEFB12FF -> it sounds like a Delphi component name, maybe
S> the mNewQt_Qt part is the classname and DEFB12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Luc,
You wrote on 3/23/2002, 12:59 AM:
Luc> after installing TB! 1.60 over my previous (1.53d) when i receive
Luc> mail and click on the appropriate folder i get the following error:
Luc> "a new component named mNewQT_QT_DEFB12FF already
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 00:06:13 GMT-0500 (which was 6:06
where I live) Allie C Martin wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version: bug?":
ACM> Hmmm. Since using TB!, I've never gotten away with giving two QT's the
ACM> same handle. TB! woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 05:47:51 +0100, Luc [L] wrote these comments:
...
L> Actually, Nick, you did help me out: it was my QT's but it was a
L> strange thing: i had the precisely the same QT's and in the previous
L> version (obviously). One of them had t
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 20:21:55 GMT-0800 (which was 5:21
where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version: bug?":
NA> Sorry Luc... if your error doesn't exist within your existing QT's I don't
NA> know what to s
Hello Luc,
On Friday, March 22 2002 at 07:46 PM PDT, you wrote:
> Well, i haven't detected anything strange with them, and why would
> they be acting this way after having them for a long time now without
> any problems?
I thought you mentioned that you had two copies of TB installed, but af
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 19:34:14 GMT-0800 (which was 4:34
where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version: bug?":
NA> I never used QT's but it sure sounds as if you have a Folder or Account
NA> Level Template that is som
Hello Luc,
On Friday, March 22 2002 at 05:26 PM PDT, you wrote:
> Nothing: did a search and came up with only the messages wherein the
> text comes up. Could this by some strange effect has to do with the
> fact that i have a backup of TB! in another folder and directory
> (made it before i inst
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 16:48:19 GMT-0800 (which was 1:48
where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version: bug?":
NA> No, but it may be filed that way for some reason. Try doing a search for
NA> it and see what you come up with.
Hello Luc,
On Friday, March 22 2002 at 04:42 PM PDT, you wrote:
> That was my first thought also, looking at the "QT" error, but i
> don't have a QT named that way.
No, but it may be filed that way for some reason. Try doing a search for
it and see what you come up with.
--
Nick Andriash
Co
It was foretold that on 23-3-2002 @ 16:30:08 GMT-0800 (which was 1:30
where I live) Nick Andriash wrote and spread these wise comments on
"New 1.60 version: bug?":
Nick> This sounds more like a QT duplication error on your part than anything
Nick> else. Do you have a Quick Templ
Hello Luc,
On Friday, March 22 2002 at 03:59 PM PDT, you wrote:
> This occurs with some folders, but not with all of them.
>
> Is this a bug, has anyone else this problem...?
This sounds more like a QT duplication error on your part than anything
else. Do you have a Quick Template in use na
Hi list,
after installing TB! 1.60 over my previous (1.53d) when i receive
mail and click on the appropriate folder i get the following error:
"a new component named mNewQT_QT_DEFB12FF already exists". When i
click OK, i can open the folder without problems.
This occurs with some folde
13 matches
Mail list logo