Hello Marck,
Monday, July 15, 2002, 10:36:29 PM, you wrote:
MDP I use AVG from Grisoft myself and have always been very satisfied with
MDP it.
Can you tell me at what .exe file I should point the 'hook'?
I guess plain avg.exe, but I also have avgcc32.exe, avginet.ext
and a whole lot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joseph,
@16 July 2002, 22:07 -0500 (04:07 UK time) Joseph N. [JN] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone:
MDP A virus in an executable parsed by an external AV is already both
MDP loaded into and visible from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
@16 July 2002, 12:17 +0700 (06:17 UK time) Thomas F [TF] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone
on TBUDL:
TF ... I would think that the AV software does understand MIME
TF encryption and will decrypt the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ochrid,
@16 July 2002, 10:28 +0200 (09:28 UK time) Ochrid [O] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone:
MDP I use AVG from Grisoft myself and have always been very
MDP satisfied with it.
OCan you tell me at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph N. [JN] wrote:
JN You just happen to keep an assortment of nasties around in virtual
JN Petri dishes, waiting for experiments??
Yes. I keep a couple for experiments. ;)
I do use the eicar
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:20:33 +0100 GMT (16/07/02, 16:20 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Actually, in the case of an external AV having intercepted the
MDP infection before TB could even see it, it *won't* be in the message
MDP base, will it?
Correct.
MDP It will never
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 11:43:41 AM, you wrote:
MDP The hook? What, for the TB plug-in?
Sorry, no, I haven't been very clear.
I was referring to what Allie C Martin called the 'hook' that she
points her Download Accelerator at.
Allie doesn´t use AVG, but you do I believe, so I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ochrid,
@16 July 2002, 13:44 +0200 (12:44 UK time) Ochrid [O] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone:
MDP The hook? What, for the TB plug-in?
O Sorry, no, I haven't been very clear.
O I was referring to what
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 2:02:20 PM, you wrote:
MDP I believe that avgse.exe (Shell Extension simple file checker, takes
MDP a filename on the command line) is the file to use.
Thanks and sorry if I was too OT / I was hooking into the thread!
--
Regards,
Ochrid
_ The Bat!
Hello Allie,
Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 9:14:42 PM, you wrote:
ACM The hook invokes the antivirus check upon completion of the download,
ACM not before or during.
Thanks for the explanation. My point was that you - obviously
much more of an expert than I am - thought it wise to hook up DAP
Hello,
Thank you all for the extensive replies to my inquiry.
I learned a lot, not just about the number of AV softwares available, but
also what is the reason for the plug-in or Hook.
Since I use GetRight already and it is linked to my current AV software, if
I can use a plug-in with Bat I
I know this is OT, so I will be brief.
Currently I am using eTrust EZ antivirus program (formerly Inoculate
Personal edition) from Computer Associates International or CAI. It is not
free, but reasonable priced. It is time for the yearly renewal. I wonder if
I should renew or choose
Hi Peter,
Monday, July 15, 2002, 3:43:45 PM, you wrote:
PK Currently I am using eTrust EZ antivirus program
Yes, I used the same until I read a review that gave it a poor rating.
Same review rated Norton top. Thought I don't always follow review
finding, I bought the Norton SystemWorks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dave Conroy [DC] wrote:
DC Yes, I used the same until I read a review that gave it a poor
DC rating. Same review rated Norton top. Thought I don't always
DC follow review finding, I bought the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dave,
@15 July 2002, 16:00 +0100 Dave Conroy [DC] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
PK Currently I am using eTrust EZ antivirus program
DC ... including Norton AV, and have been very happy with it. We now
DC run it on each
On Monday, July 15, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MDP When attachments are kept in message bodies and not in a separate
MDP folder, the plug-in quarantines the infecting message without it
MDP ever being realised on the recipient's system. It
Hi Marck,
Monday, July 15, 2002, 9:36:29 PM, you wrote:
DC ... including Norton AV, and have been very happy with it. We now
DC run it on each machine on our network.
MDP I can't stand idle and see someone promote Norton AV products
MDP when I have been so badly bitten by them.
I gave my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph N. [JN] wrote:
JN In any event, although I use it, I'm not sure the quarantining is
JN really all that different from not quarantining.
There's a qualitative difference in that you will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dave Conroy [DC] wrote:
MDP I can't stand idle and see someone promote Norton AV products
MDP when I have been so badly bitten by them.
DC I gave my opinion based on experience. Until Norton lets
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote:
JN Are you of the opinion that, with a high quality AV program in
JN effect and real-time scanning enabled, an infected file in a TB!
JN quarantine folder *cannot* be
On Monday, July 15, 2002, 6:02:57 PM, Allie wrote:
ACM Instead of running the real-time scanner, I use the plugin for mail
ACM and the hook to check downloads with an antivirus that my download
ACM manager provides.
Allie, what kind of hook or download manager do you have for this?
This is
On Monday, July 15, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Instead of running the real-time scanner, I use the plugin for mail
and the hook to check downloads with an antivirus that my download
manager provides.
Allie,
H. Although I could do the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rick Reumann [RR] wrote:
RR Allie, what kind of hook or download manager do you have for this?
RR This is what I would like. AVG is covering my Bat e-mail just
RR perfect but I do download a lot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph N. [JN] wrote:
JN H. Although I could do the same, and trust my firewall to
JN keep out nasty attackers, it seems a big risk.
But why?
If you can automatically check what comes in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joseph,
@15 July 2002, 15:55 -0500 (21:55 UK time) Joseph N. [JN] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone:
JN I've been using the NOD plug-in. ... flickering and diverting the
JN focus every time it scans a file.
On Monday, July 15, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MDP A virus in an executable parsed by an external AV is already both
MDP loaded into and visible from the OS. Raw MIME data in a message
MDP base folder is neither.
Marck,
Yes, that's true. But
Monday, July 15, 2002, 4:24:24 PM, Rick wrote:
RR On Monday, July 15, 2002, 6:02:57 PM, Allie wrote:
ACM Instead of running the real-time scanner, I use the plugin for mail
ACM and the hook to check downloads with an antivirus that my download
ACM manager provides.
RR Allie, what kind of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph N. [JN] wrote:
JN Yes, that's true. But if the attachment remains in the message body
JN under both conditions, then the difference you described does not
JN exist, right?
Yes. If you
On Monday, July 15, 2002, 6:31:05 PM, Allie C Martin wrote:
ACM Currently I use Download Accelerator Plus. It provides the hook. I
ACM also know that Getright provides an antivirus check hook.
Does this also really accelerate download times using a cable
modem? I'm totally happy with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rick Reumann [RR] wrote:
RR Does this also really accelerate download times using a cable
RR modem?
Potentially yes, since it works off the principle that downloading the
same file using multiple
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 01:54:18 +0100 GMT (16/07/02, 07:54 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Yes. As I see it there is a clear difference. A virus in an executable
MDP parsed by an external AV is already both loaded into and visible from
MDP the OS. Raw MIME data in a message
I just confirmed this by exporting an infected
message to file.
You just happen to keep an assortment of nasties around in virtual
Petri dishes, waiting for experiments??
--
JN
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ:
32 matches
Mail list logo
