Hello Marck,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 17:33:20 (your local time), you wrote:
MDP> I all fairness, the very ethos of full IMAP, with on-line folder
MDP> structures, goes against the TB strengths in local mail-base. I can't
MDP> see how TB can offer full IMAP support and still be the TB we all
MDP> "know and love" with extreme filter, RegEx support and archive
MDP> searching capabilities. This is probably the reason TB only offers it
MDP> as a glorified POP3.
I greatly agree with your point about TB "that we all know and love". I found
myself in it, thanks.
Actually, I use to ask myself sometimes why RIT doesn't make some variants of
TB, i.e. TB Lite (limited filter functions, no regexes and only POP3/SMTP), TB
"Profy" (for advanced users who need IMAP or some sort alike, more
business-comfortable) etc. Perhaps, RIT will make them, but I frankly hope they
will NOT!
Maybe all of this sound stupid, but here on these lists we got topics like this
one all the times... Some users are unsatisfied with Bat! and they need "this",
need "that"... ugh.
Sorry for off-topic.
--
Best Regards, Lija
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
