OT: "i don't know you" (was: Start up: The Bat balks)

2003-09-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello David, On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:32:46 -0400 GMT (08/09/2003, 20:32 +0700 GMT), David R. Austen wrote: Sorry for posting a PM on the list. I replied to your PM, but I have been asked by your bot to confirm my address. I'm not doing that. You want to review your policy for two reasons: 1.) You

Re: OT: "i don't know you" (was: Start up: The Bat balks)

2003-09-08 Thread David R. Austen
Hello, Thomas: Monday, September 8, 2003, 11:17:21 AM, you wrote: TF> Sorry for posting a PM on the list. I replied to your PM, but I have TF> been asked by your bot to confirm my address. I regret the inconvenience. Please send me your message with the advice. It will go through now. Yes, the

Re: OT: "i don't know you" (was: Start up: The Bat balks)

2003-09-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello David, On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:50:13 -0400 GMT (08/09/2003, 23:50 +0700 GMT), David R. Austen wrote: > I regret the inconvenience. Please send me your message with the > advice. It will go through now. I have moved it back to the Outbox. You should receive it soon. > Yes, the bot asks for a

Re: OT: "i don't know you" (was: Start up: The Bat balks)

2003-09-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi David, on Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:50:13 -0400GMT (08.09.03, 18:50 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : ... TF>> 2.) If you are trying to cut down spam, you will just have confirmed TF>> your address to the sender. DRA> Good point. On very, very rare occasions, a spammer actually a