Re: On read filter.

2002-10-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Chris, On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:46:18 -0700 GMT (19/10/02, 07:46 +0700 GMT), Chris Weaven wrote: Simply tell the 'Read message' filter to filter only message 'not flagged' and you're done. [...] > The filter was working fine, not I've set it to manual and assigned a > hot-key, but

Re: On read filter.

2002-10-18 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Thomas, On Friday, October 18, 2002 09:44 your local time, which was Thursday, October 17, 2002 at 19:44 my local time, Thomas Fernandez [TF] wrote; >>> Simply tell the 'Read message' filter to filter only message 'not >>> flagged' and you're done. >> Is there a quick key combination to do th

Re: On read filter.

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Chris, On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:00:13 -0700 GMT (18/10/02, 09:00 +0700 GMT), Chris Weaven wrote: >> Simply tell the 'Read message' filter to filter only message 'not >> flagged' and you're done. > Is there a quick key combination to do this? You can assign a hotkey to that filter. > Also,

Re: On read filter.

2002-10-17 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Peter, On Wednesday, October 16, 2002 12:29 your local time, which was 03:29 my local time, Peter Palmreuther wrote; > Simply tell the 'Read message' filter to filter only message 'not > flagged' and you're done. Is there a quick key combination to do this? > If you want to delete a message

Re: On read filter.

2002-10-16 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Roelof, On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 01:00:13 +0200 Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Problem is, even if you delete the mail, it still get's filtered >> to it's respective folder. > > Don't delete it, but flag it and set as option for your filter that > it's only triggered by unfiltered mes

Re: On read filter.

2002-10-15 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Chris, > Problem is, even if you delete the mail, it still get's filtered to it's > respective folder. > > Is there anyway that if you hit delete, it bins it rather than ignoring > me and filtering it to it's folder anyway? H. That's strange. I use a good number of read filters and I h

Re: On read filter.

2002-10-15 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Chris, On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:29:49 -0700 GMT (16/10/02, 05:29 +0700 GMT), Chris Weaven wrote: CW> Problem is, even if you delete the mail, it still get's filtered to it's CW> respective folder. And in the destination folder it is undeleted? I'd consider it a bug. -- Cheers, Thomas. M

Re: On read filter.

2002-10-15 Thread Adam Bradley
Tuesday, October 15, 2002, 11:29:49 PM, you wrote: > Is there anyway that if you hit delete, it bins it rather than ignoring > me and filtering it to it's folder anyway? I don't really use read filters, but something just sprung to mind so I thought I'd suggest it. Could you set up a filter that

Re: On read filter.

2002-10-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Chris, On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:29:49 -0700GMT (16-10-02, 0:29 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: CW> Problem is, even if you delete the mail, it still get's filtered to it's CW> respective folder. Don't delete it, but flag it and set as option for your filter that it's only triggered by u

On read filter.

2002-10-15 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi, I love the on read filter, but there's one thing I'd like to change, or find out if it can be fixed. Before the mail is processed, I like to read it, obviously, as the filter wouldn't work, but at this stage, I like to decide if to delete the mail or keep it. Problem is, eve