Re: Other spam catching systems

On Wed 28 April 2004, 3:38:26 +1000, Marten Gallagher wrote: > I run NAV and that is covered by chaining proxies malarky. I used to run NAV to check downloaded email for viruses and I assume that is what you are referring to (as opposed to the standard virus protection of files on disk). Although

Re: Other spam catching systems

Hello Marten, > But my main question is: what if I have more than one POP mail server? No problem. > Is the chaining set up separately for each account in TB and therefore > it is irrelevant? Correct. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.10.01

Re: Other spam catching systems

On Monday, April 26, 2004, 5:03 PM, you wrote: MG> I want something to sit between The Bat and the various POP servers MG> that will identify as best it can, any Spam and let it through to me MG> marked as such so I can filter it and check it once in a while for MG> mis-categorized spam. others

Re[2]: Other spam catching systems

On Tuesday, April 27, 2004 at 5:56:10 AM, you wrote: > On Tue 27 April 2004, 7:03:14 +1000, Marten Gallagher wrote: >> What other options are there available? > Popfile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net). Love it. > Running at 99.6% accuracy with three classifications (work, personal and > spam).

Re: Other spam catching systems

Marten, On 26-04-2004 23:03, you [MG] wrote in : MG> What other options are there available? SpamPal (.org) is very good! Have used it myself for around a year(?). -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 2.10.01 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 ___

Re: Other spam catching systems

On Tue 27 April 2004, 7:03:14 +1000, Marten Gallagher wrote: > What other options are there available? Popfile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net). Love it. Running at 99.6% accuracy with three classifications (work, personal and spam). -- Robin Anson Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build

Re: Other spam catching systems

Hello Richard, On Monday, April 26, 2004, 8:15 PM, Richard H. Stoddard wrote: RHS> Has anyone tried Norton's new anti-spam program? At least in principle RHS> the program resides and filters mail on my computer, not a proxy RHS> server, if I understand the description of it correctly. But does it

Re: Other spam catching systems

Marten, Tuesday, April 27, 2004, 2:03:14 AM, you wrote: MG> I use The Bat. MG> The Anti-Spam plug in causes problems - crashing, freezing on download MG> etc etc. MG> What other options are there available? I'm using the plugin as well, and while I don't have these problems, it's catching only 5

Re: Other spam catching systems

Hello Marten, Monday, April 26, 2004, 2:03:14 PM, you wrote: MG> Hi MG> I use The Bat. MG> The Anti-Spam plug in causes problems - crashing, freezing on download MG> etc etc. MG> What other options are there available? MG> Note: I have 38 email accounts to check; many genuine emails from MG> ad

Re: Other spam catching systems

Hello Marten, > I want something to sit between The Bat and the various POP servers > that will identify as best it can, any Spam and let it through to me > marked as such so I can filter it and check it once in a while for > mis-categorized spam. I've been using POPFile ( http://popfile.sourcefo

Re: Other spam catching systems

Hi On 26 April 2004 at 22:15 Dave Gorman said: >> I want something to sit between The Bat and the various POP servers >> that will identify as best it can, any Spam and let it through to me >> marked as such so I can filter it and check it once in a while for >> mis-categorized spam. > After a s

Other spam catching systems

Hi I use The Bat. The Anti-Spam plug in causes problems - crashing, freezing on download etc etc. What other options are there available? Note: I have 38 email accounts to check; many genuine emails from addresses (of potential clients as well)nI don't know so white-listing would not be appropria

Re: Other spam catching systems

Hello Marten, Monday, April 26, 2004, 4:03:14 PM, you wrote: > I want something to sit between The Bat and the various POP servers > that will identify as best it can, any Spam and let it through to me > marked as such so I can filter it and check it once in a while for > mis-categorized spam. A