Parked, so to speak.

Dear Batlist Is there a way to move 'Parked' messages to another folder without losing their parked status on arrival? -- Best regards, Stephen -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to th

Re: Parked, so to speak.

Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Friday, February 04, 2000, rellieb-jean wrote to TBUDL about Parked, so to speak.: rj> Is there a way to move 'Parked' messages to another folder without rj> losing their parked status on arrival? No. Parking now means parking to fol

Re: Parked, so to speak.

This message: 04/02/2000 12:28 GMT. Hello rellieb-jean, Friday, February 04, 2000, 11:41:04 AM, you wrote: rj> Is there a way to move 'Parked' messages to another folder without rj> losing their parked status on arrival? I just un park them, move them to the folder I want and then pa

Re: Parked, so to speak.

Hi there! On 4 Feb 00, at 16:16, Oleg Zalyalov wrote about "Re: Parked, so to speak.": > rj> Is there a way to move 'Parked' messages to another folder without > rj> losing their parked status on arrival? > > No. Parking now means parking to folder,

Re: Parked, so to speak.

Hi there! On 4 Feb 00, at 20:34, Oleg Zalyalov wrote about "Re[2]: Parked, so to speak.": > >> Does it make sense to anyone? > AVK> Nope, for me it doesn't. > I meant did anyone understood my post. :( ÷ÓÅ ÐÏÎÑÌ, ËÒÏÍÅ ÆÉÎÁÌØÎÏÇÏ ×ÏÐÒÏÓÁ:-) ëÒÕÔÏ! >

Re: Parked, so to speak.

Hi there! On 4 Feb 00, at 21:29, Oleg Zalyalov wrote about "Re[2]: Parked, so to speak.": > Friday, February 04, 2000, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >about > Parked, so to speak.: > > AVK> Do you see any sense in forcing inability to *move*

Re: Parked, so to speak.

On Mon, 7 Feb 2000 11:08:22 +0400, Oleg Zalyalov wrote: > Well, suppose I have a read messages filter for folder to move to some > archive folder. And sometimes I want some messages to remain in this > source folder for a while. I can park them. After I have no need for > them in source fo

Re[2]: Parked, so to speak.

Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Friday, February 04, 2000, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about Parked, so to speak.: >> Does it make sense to anyone? AVK> Nope, for me it doesn't. I meant did anyone understood my post. :( AVK> I'd better have a clear &q

Re[2]: Parked, so to speak.

Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Friday, February 04, 2000, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about Parked, so to speak.: AVK> Do you see any sense in forcing inability to *move* the message to another AVK> folder? What practical usage can you suggest for this? I cannot th

Re[2]: Parked, so to speak.

Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Friday, February 04, 2000, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about Parked, so to speak.: AVK> *I* can't. If it were "read-only" flag, I certainly could: I use this feature in AVK> Pegasus. But in TB having set the "