Re: Filed sorting

Hello Dwight, On Fri, 20 May 2005 you wrote in DAC> There seems to be some notion that it is WRONG to want to make a note DAC> in a message, and that someone might one day perpetrate a forgery if DAC> such an ability existed, and they are saving users from themselves. I u

Re: Filed sorting

At 19:55 [GMT+0100] on Friday May 20 (actual time - 2:55am on Saturday in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote: >> If you just want to see flagged messages, there is a better method to do >> that without re-sorting. Just Alt+click on the flag of a flagged >> message. > How do I find a flagged me

Re: Filed sorting

Hello Steve, > I think the point I am getting at is why do some of these interface > issues have to be set up and not be the default - for instance surely > threading by Reference + Subject should be the default as it is the > natural way to read messages. ??? You'd be surprised of how many diffe

Re: Filed sorting

On Friday, May 20, 2005, 3:38:00 PM, Steve Lee wrote: > for instance surely threading by Reference + Subject should be the > default as it is the natural way to read messages. ??? Not the way it is currently implemented. If subjects repeat over time, it may get buried in ages old thread, instead

Re: Filed sorting

Hello Nick, > Another thought, if you find yourself looking for flagged messages > more than once or twice a year you might want to whip up a virtual > folder for flagged messages. Comes in handy and I only use it > sparingly. That's another good idea. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Esco

Re: Filed sorting

Hello Steve, >> If you just want to see flagged messages, there is a better method to do >> that without re-sorting. Just Alt+click on the flag of a flagged >> message. > > How do I find a flagged message unless I have sorted by flagged > messages? Oh come on! I don't know if you are joking or w

Re: Filed sorting

Hi Steve, on Fri, 20 May 2005 19:55:22 +0100GMT (20.05.2005, 20:55 +0200GMT here), you wrote: >> If you just want to see flagged messages, there is a better method to do >> that without re-sorting. Just Alt+click on the flag of a flagged >> message. SL> How do I find a flagged message unless I

Re: Filed sorting

Reply to message sent 5/20/2005, @ 19:55:22 (1:55 PM Locally) ~~~ Hello Steve, > How do I find a flagged message unless I have sorted by flagged > messages? Another thought, if you find yourself looking for flagged messages more than on

Re: Filed sorting

Hello Steve, > Ah but in which case why would you click the sort by column buttons if you > did not want to see the messages with the flags If you just want to see flagged messages, there is a better method to do that without re-sorting. Just Alt+click on the flag of a flagged message. It works t

Re: Filed sorting

Hello MAU & everyone else, on 20-Mai-2005 at 03:32 you (MAU) wrote: > Just you wait Mr. Lee. :) I personally prefer the current behaviour > which leaves the selected message in view. Same here. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) The trouble with my wife is t

Re: Filed sorting

On Friday, May 20, 2005, 10:28:53 AM, Steve Lee wrote: > Ah but in which case why would you click the sort by column buttons > if you did not want to see the messages with the flags Perhaps the message in view is one of the messages in the class of messages sorted for, and perhaps one doesn't wan

Re: Filed sorting

Hello Steve, > When we click on one for the field headings to sort the table, could you > please have the scroll bar shoot up (or down) so that you can see the > first or last message? > > In theory clicking on the flagged column for instance, all the flagged > messages should shoot to the top an