Re[2]: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-02 Thread N. Sean Timm
Hello Zach, Sunday, December 02, 2001, 12:15:08 PM, you wrote: ZR> Sunday, December 02, 2001, 11:50:17 AM, James Senick wrote: >> I got the same. But I think that was an auto generated >> send from the trojan. Possibly not. But that would be my first >> guess seeing how it was the B

Re[2]: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-02 Thread Kris Vermandere
Hello, I also have a question about HTML : I know that I can't create a HTML message, but what do I have to do when I want to reply to a HTML message, or when I want to forward it? Then the HTML structure is lost, and all that is left is plain text, so the receiver will not see the original conte

Re[2]: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-01 Thread N. Sean Timm
Hello James, Saturday, December 01, 2001, 8:54:39 PM, you wrote: JS> On viruses and external images...from the business end JS> it would be ridiculous to expect customers to put up with JS> embedded images. Keeping them external at least gives the JS> customer a chance to delete the mes

Re[2]: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-01 Thread Eric Malausséna
Hi Marck, On samedi 1 décembre 2001 at 12:47:31, you wrote : EM>> All other software I tried (Pegasus, Eudora, Pocomail...) let me EM>> see all "external" gif or jpeg included in HTML messages... MDP> Shame on them! Is this as an option? Even if it's optional, it's not MDP> right: IMHO, The Ba