Oh no, I can't help myself... >> I hope you are wrong about the feature being added. You will >> never convince me of a legitimate reason to modify incoming >> messages. E-Mail is frequently used as evidence in court cases.
TF> But only if sender's mid and receiver's mid show the same message, TF> isn't it? I can modify any message by exporting/editing/importing it. >> I do not believe any E-mail client should have that function, >> without a big red flag printed across the message. TF> I am all for that "red flag", or a small icon indicating that the TF> message was edited, which I don't have in the current version. ;-) Surely an answer (if there is to be one) is to add, rather than modify? If each stored message was given _extra_ fields: Subject(modified) and Body(modified), these could then be assigned to the default view by those who want them. These fields by default would only be pointers to the original fields unless modified via macros or manual edit. Just a thought, I'll shut up now. -- Nick Using TheBat!: v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
