, ( Friday, October 24, 2003 Pixie wrote: )
Pixie> Not really a big deal but sometimes I have to double-take to notice
Pixie> a black-blue change of the "@" glyph.
Pixie> I've not bothered with the external glyph file so far but might
Pixie> since I'd really like something more co
Hi,
On Thursday at 3:21 AM you wrote:
A> 10/22/2003, 11:55 PM: Pixie said in "Account glyph change?"
P>> Do you know was that something that changed with 2.01 or new for .3?
A> I can't remember /for certain/, but thinking back I'm pretty sure those
A> @'s happened in 2.01.3 . . . correct me if I
Hello Pixie,
On 22 October 2003, at 23:55:15 (GMT -0400) you wrote:
P> Hmm.. Confusing as I didn't see anything in the change-log about
P> this specifically.
I guess developers tried to make a surprise for our .
But black '@' is associates for me like some mournful :(
P> Do you know was that so
3 matches
Mail list logo
