Re[2]: Automated response(?)

2003-06-13 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Mike, On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, at 12:17:52 [GMT -0400] (which was 17:17 in my TimeZone) you wrote: >> Hello Mike, >> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, at 11:02:46 [GMT -0400] (which was 16:02 in my >> TimeZone) you wrote: MA> MA> The practice of publishing my entire message header here, and in the

Re[2]: Automated response(?)

2003-06-13 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Mike, On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, at 11:02:46 [GMT -0400] (which was 16:02 in my TimeZone) you wrote: MA> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MA> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MA> Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:02:55 +0200 MA> Received: from [62.80.28.8] (helo=draenor.its-toasted.org) MA>

Re[2]: Automated response(?)

2003-06-13 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Mike, On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, at 10:45:41 [GMT -0400] (which was 15:45 in my TimeZone) you wrote: >> Your message was automatically moved for review without being read >> because HTML formatting was detected as: %OATTACHMENTS. MA> It is likely the %OATTACHMENTS macro is at fault here, if

Re[2]: Automated response(?)

2003-06-13 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello Roelof, On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, at 16:30:02 [GMT +0200] (which was 15:30 in my TimeZone) you wrote: RO> Hallo Michael, RO> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 05:52:48 +0100GMT (13-6-03, 6:52 +0200, where I RO> live), you wrote: MT>> When I am sending a "Automatic Response" using Rules, How can I MT>> ge