Re[2]: Bat better than SpamKiller. Now

2002-05-06 Thread reclutamiento
"Even more effective than that: Selective download filters! They automate the process of eliminating spam without downloading any more that the header". --- Would yo comment further on this???, please. __ Running Bat v1.6

Re[2]: Bat better than SpamKiller. Now

2002-05-06 Thread Michael T. Ashby
Marck, For those of us that are newbies, what does this filter do exactly? Michael Ashby Monday, May 6, 2002, 10:12:39 AM, you wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi John, MDP> @06 May 2002, 14:46:03 +0100 John Galvin wrote in MDP> [EMAIL

Re[2]: Bat better than SpamKiller. Now

2002-05-06 Thread Michael Geyer
Hi John On Montag, 6. Mai 2002 at 16:34:46GMT +0100 (which was 17:34 where I live) you wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at least in parts): > I still have the problem with html emails though. Just try Marck's filter - I did and it worked perfectly. (I guess the Unix-Mbox

Re[2]: Bat better than SpamKiller. Now

2002-05-14 Thread John Thomas
MDP> I focus any spam anywhere and press Ctrl-Alt-S. ByeBye Spam! (I MDP> copy this filter to all accounts). How can I make this work on common folders? For me, this does not seem to work on common folders. I filter messages to common folders. Spam ends up in an Inbox-UnKnown folder. When I cl