On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 12:59:51 -0600 GMT(20/01/2003, 6:59 PM
+ GMT), Greg Strong wrote:
GS> People by their own experience relate to OE. This
GS> argument of bloatware is nothing more than hog wash! VA
GS> was (is) not bloat ware.
And nor is Ameol, which is the other mail/conferencing
program
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 11:19:53 AM,Miguel wrote:
MAU> Why are some of you somewhat "afraid" of a newsreader/mail client
MAU> combo? It could be (should be) quite transparent to you if you just
MAU> want to use it for e-mail. As I envision it, the difference would
MAU> (could) be that when you
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 1:58:31 PM,Paul wrote:
PC> I have 2 antivirus plugins, the NOD32 (test version 0.1) and AVG 10.
PC> I am using AVG, and I don't remember why I added the NOD32 plugin.
Paul, this could well be your problem. It's never recommended to run
two a/v's together as they can f
Hello Miguel,
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 2:32:32 PM, you wrote:
>> You can't simply compare it to another language as you did in
>> another message ... Spanish vs English.
MAU> It was just a way of trying to explain it to Mary. I should have
MAU> chosen a better example. What if TB editor only
Saturday, January 18, 2003, 11:30:12 AM,Miguel wrote:
MAU> Ever tried Second Copy 2000 from http://www.centered.com/ ?
Thanks Miguel, no I hadn't tried this. It's been suggested elsewhere
that the freeware program Replicator from Karenware.com may do this as
well, so I shall check them both out
Hi all,
Samstag, 18. Januar 2003 12:28 you wrote:
i am lurking into this thread with interest. This discussion reminds me a lot to those
Macintosh <---> Windows and OS/2 <---> Windows Discussions.
In my opinion, The Bat needs to support all the features, the main competition (M$) is
offering - t
Friday, January 17, 2003, 5:32:14 PM,Miguel wrote:
MAU> Don't underestimate Ritlabs' programers. If they could write a better
MAU> e-mail client why do you assume they won't be able to write a better
MAU> newsreader?
If it was standalone one then I'd have no problems with it. I
wouldn't want to
Hello Miguel,
Friday, January 17, 2003, 6:30:31 PM, you wrote:
MAU> Hello Laura,
>> resistance is futile, html is here to stay.
MAU> Just like Coca-Cola and McDonald ;-)
Well, it just so happens that MacDonalds is having financial problems
and is shutting "restaurants" all over the world :)
-
mj> Attach the report as an HTML file, most recipient will find
mj> it more convenient that way.
working in offices its not as easy.. but i don't want to get in
an argument about it
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62 | "Us
resistance is futile, html is here to stay.
>> I will soon be implementing a filter that sends to trash and deletes
>> any e-mail containing HTML - PERIOD!
MAU> I never write/send HTML e-mail, and I don't think I will in
the MAU> future. But if I implemented a filter like you intend
to, I would M
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On or about Friday, January 17, 2003 at 17:38:38GMT +0100 (which
was 11:38 AM in the tropics where I live) Miguel A. Urech opined:
MAU> Hello Spike,
>> Wanting everything rolled into one is what causes vulnerability
>> and bloatware. Leave TB just as it is, a simple and ef
Hello Markus Gloede,
On or about Friday, January 17, 2003 at 16:26:55GMT +0100 (which
was 10:26 AM in the tropics where I live) Markus Gloede shocked
us all by stating:
MG> (1) HTML was never intended for email use, it is mostly
MG> being abused in an email context
Amen brother!!
MG> (2) Read
12 matches
Mail list logo
