Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

2003-09-04 Thread Edward J. Shornock
On Thursday, September 04, 2003, Clive Taylor wrote: CT> Yup. Keep complaining. IMAP doesn't work well in this version - CT> a big disappointment. I concur with that. The IMAP support is *better* than in v1.x by far, but it still needs more work. It's kinda sad that Outlook Express has very go

Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

2003-09-05 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Jonathan, Friday, September 5, 2003, 1:35:05 AM, you wrote: JA> I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before JA> checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of what is JA> selectable and what isn't on first login. Please add it to the BT so it's not forgott

Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

2003-09-05 Thread Antje Lehmann
Hi, Brian S. Schang wrote: > Clive, >> Inbox >> Inbox.subs >> Inbox.subs.TBUDL >> Inbox.xxx >> Inbox.xxx.yyy > So do Inbox.subs and Inbox.xxx contain messages, or are they just > entities to hold TBUDL and yyy respectively? I have a similar structure and in my case they could contain messages

Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

2003-09-07 Thread Brian S. Schang
Hello: >> It's my understanding (maybe erroneously) that not all >> implementations of IMAP allow for folder to contain messages >> themselves?? I'm using the University of Washington version that >> ships with Red Hat 7.2. JA> That's not an erroneous statement at all. In fact, a very valid JA> s

Re: Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

2003-09-05 Thread Brian S. Schang
Hello: JA> I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before JA> checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of what is JA> selectable and what isn't on first login. Please add it to the BT so it's not forgotten :-) The \NoSelect flag can be detected, but it is not u