On Thursday, September 04, 2003, Clive Taylor wrote:
CT> Yup. Keep complaining. IMAP doesn't work well in this version -
CT> a big disappointment.
I concur with that. The IMAP support is *better* than in v1.x by far,
but it still needs more work.
It's kinda sad that Outlook Express has very go
Hello Jonathan,
Friday, September 5, 2003, 1:35:05 AM, you wrote:
JA> I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before
JA> checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of what is
JA> selectable and what isn't on first login.
Please add it to the BT so it's not forgott
Hi,
Brian S. Schang wrote:
> Clive,
>> Inbox
>> Inbox.subs
>> Inbox.subs.TBUDL
>> Inbox.xxx
>> Inbox.xxx.yyy
> So do Inbox.subs and Inbox.xxx contain messages, or are they just
> entities to hold TBUDL and yyy respectively?
I have a similar structure and in my case they could contain messages
Hello:
>> It's my understanding (maybe erroneously) that not all
>> implementations of IMAP allow for folder to contain messages
>> themselves?? I'm using the University of Washington version that
>> ships with Red Hat 7.2.
JA> That's not an erroneous statement at all. In fact, a very valid
JA> s
Hello:
JA> I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before
JA> checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of
what is
JA> selectable and what isn't on first login.
Please add it to the BT so it's not forgotten :-) The \NoSelect
flag can be detected, but it is not u
5 matches
Mail list logo