Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 11:07:12 AM, you wrote:
CT> This is straight from FM's FAQ - it's a one-off set up..
Thank you! Apparently I didn't read far enough into the
FAQ ... sorry ... So that might be workable .. I might
have to do some tinkering here.
Lynn
TBv 2.04.7 Windowsv 5
--
[EMAIL PROT
Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 7:57:28 AM, you wrote:
PF> TB! filtering engine is being rewritten as it
PF> does not work for IMAP at
PF> the moment.
PF> Watch coming releases...
I will .. thanks
Lynn
TBv 2.04.7 Windowsv 5
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * *
Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:33:40 PM, you wrote:
>> do FastMail and MailSnare actually forward the mail out? If so, why
>> can't it be forwarded to a POP account in TB?
CT> Have a look at FastMail's features.
Yes, I did that yesterday after I'd posted .. I often do
things backwards :-)
CT> Go to
Monday, May 3, 2004, 10:42:50 AM, you wrote:
CT> I've just mentioned to Jim that FastMail or
CT> Mailsnare offer extremely
CT> good POP, IMAP and forwarding facilities for external mail.
well, I'm looking at Mulberry, but ... :-( I'm really not
keen on web interfaces; do FastMail and MailSnare
a
Sunday, May 2, 2004, 7:47:33 AM, you wrote:
CT> Hi Dave,
>> nothing else I've tried comes close to TB! for most features, but IMAP
>> has become essential, and perhaps I'll need to compromise in other
>> areas to get acceptable IMAP support.
CT> Exactly my conclusion. I've lost patience recently
Hello all,
Saturday, May 1, 2004, Dave Gorman wrote:
>> do incoming rules work automatically when using IMAP and TheBat?
> No. It has been promised, but the timeline is anyone's guess. At this
> point it seems the virtual folders are a higher priority.
new filtering system is under development
E-Mail Message
~~
From: Dave Gorman
Date: Saturday, May 01, 2004 at 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: IMAP rules ..
_
_\/_
o/\o
DG> Hello Jody,
DG> Friday, April 30, 2004, 8:17:53 PM, you wrote:
>> do incoming rules
7 matches
Mail list logo
