On Tuesday, September 18, 2001, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> Also referring to RFC 2392 the message-id has to be in syntax a
> 'url-addr-spec' like described in RFC 822. There the syntax of 'url-addr-spec'
> is specified as
>
> addr-spec = local-part "@" domain; global address
>
But
Hallo Peter,
PP> Of course I _do_ know nobody would feel disturbed if he does nevertheless but
PP> as a good MUA tries to follow RFCs one can not expect it to (re)write message-id
PP> in this 'false' way :-)
TB uses the host-part of the address to form the msg-id. Unfortunately
it doesn't use th
On Wednesday, September 12, 2001, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> Well ... I actually don't think this as a good idea as the full stop is in
> domain names the seperator for the host/domain hierarchical ... so
> 'username.domain.tld' is in fact the correct 'name' for a host named
> 'username' in domai
Hallo Peter,
RO>> Currently my Message-ID is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RO>> Is it possible for TB to change the ID into something as
RO>> weirdnumber.datetime@MyFullAddress?
PP> What do you mean with 'FullAddress' ??? Full-E-Mail-Address? I hope you don't!
PP> this would mean Message-ID containing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck
On 15 March 2001 at 13:15:34 + (which was 13:15 where I live) Marck D.
Pearlstone Wrote
> a saved draft becomes divorced from the original message
And I find this a pain!
- --
Thank you for your time,
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, February 08, 2001, Mark Knipfer wrote to OK3 about
Message-ID macro?:
>>>From Help Topic "Complete list of template macros":
O>> MSGID - insert the current messages Message ID (taken from the
MK> I cannot find this help topic in the The Bat! 1.4
Hello,
>> For example:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Does the Bat! generate this field? And, most importantly, how are the
>> first four digits generated?
SL> Yes. This is, IMHO, how it should be since it is quite hard to search
SL> your archives for a MSGID that doesn't exist. As for the first f
7 matches
Mail list logo
