Re[2]: PGP or S/MIME ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, Monday, April 29, 2002, 4:49:05 AM, you wrote: MDP> Not true, actually Nick. I use GPG without any tray application. I MDP> only use the try tools to access the key manager and lookup keys I MDP> don't have on my keyring. All sign/verif

Re[2]: PGP or S/MIME ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, Monday, April 29, 2002, 6:12:18 AM, you wrote: ACM> Indeed the signing and signature verification aspects work nicely. I ACM> don't use GPG Shell for signing messages *at all*. However, for ACM> decryption and encryption I use GPG Shell

Re[2]: PGP or S/MIME ?

Hello Nick, Monday, April 29, 2002, 1:49:15 AM, you wrote: NA> Yes, you are right... you can have seamless on the fly signing NA> with PGP because there are specific PGP DLL's that TB uses for NA> that... RITLabs have developed a Plugin specifically for that NA> purpose. Hopefully, the upcoming

Re[2]: PGP or S/MIME ?

Hello Allie, Sunday, April 28, 2002, 1:58:08 PM, you wrote: ACM> I'd always use PGP/GnuPG if I could help it. I was installing WinPT. In the PDF file for the install it refers to OpenPGP that I believe is GPG (i.e. same as GnuPG at http://www.gnupg.org/). What functionality specifically does

Re[2]: PGP or S/MIME ?

Hello Allie, Sunday, April 28, 2002, 1:58:08 PM, you wrote: ACM> You can use S/MIME and PGP interchangeably but where ever the ACM> opportunity presents itself, I think you should go for PGP. I would agree. You have to be able to communicate with whomever under whatever is agreed upon between t

Re[2]: PGP or S/MIME ?

Hello Allie, Saturday, April 27, 2002, 2:11:35 PM, you wrote: ACM> It's not a question of the need being there since he has decided ACM> to use one solution. It's a matter of which is the more ACM> appropriate under the circumstances. Can you use either method depending upon the individual circ