Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > Hello Philippe Macaire & everyone else,
> on 30-Aug-2006 at 10:06 you (Philippe Macaire) wrote: >> Any experience, someone? > None with TBs backup and that sizes - but what happens when you set up a > similar backup event with ntbackup? You could compare the results of the > incremental backup with those from TB and see if its any different. Thanks for the pointer to ntbackup, but I would really like to have a more efficient backup using TB (I'm currently using a free version of SyncBack, a really nice product for backup and syncronization -- check here: http://www.2brightsparks.com/). Actually, I tried to cleanup a bit my accounts, by moving old messages into special (Common) folders. Then I made a full maintenance operation (compression, integrity check, ecc.). Unfortunately I don't know which of the two operations made things work, but now my incremental backup (excluding the huge common folders) works like a breeze! Next time I will try to separate these two operations in order to check which one may have been the actual solution. Thanks for the help anyway. -- Best regards, Philippe. Using The Bat! 3.80.06 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
