Re[2]: RegEx not perfect (yet)

2006-02-05 Thread rich gregory
>> Sure, "we" worked on that! Don't you remember? ;) MM> Could I forget it? You were silent for a while and I already wanted to MM> ask you how it goes with the last killer-filter. I wondered if you had MM> wrecked more mails due to some typo/bad retyping then you wished to... No, a family em

Re[2]: RegEx not perfect (yet)

2006-02-05 Thread rich gregory
>> The RegEx we worked on seems to work but only sometimes as today this >> email (header excerpt) got thru: >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MM> "We" worked on "Name ", at your own request, not on "address". MM> That's the reason why Linda Wily Liar got through this what we didn't MM> work on. Sure