Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-07 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:13:44 PM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome Jack Morrison & everyone else, > on 07-Aug-2005 at 20:14 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote: >>> And btw. - when you copy the old account folders and their subfolders back >>> into place, you'll also restore your old messages (and e

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-07 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Sunday, August 7, 2005, 1:24:54 PM, you wrote: [] > Exactly. You copy the contents of the old account folder (your old "John > Doe" directory) over the contents of the new account directory. > But wait! > Before you copy the old files over the new files, *please* back up the > *new* files to a d

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-07 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:45:34 AM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome Jack Morrison & everyone else, > on 07-Aug-2005 at 00:57 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote: >> Will there be conflicts because of that, if and when I ever do attempt to >> re-import the "old" data into my new version of TB? > If y

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-06 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 8:34:12 PM, you wrote: [] >> Now, when I did setup these "new" Accounts, I used different names for >> each of them (different from their "old" names). > Now why do that? Why complicate the issue? Well, I wasn't sure that's what I was doing. >> Will there be conflicts

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-06 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 6:10:40 PM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome Jack Morrison & everyone else, > on 06-Aug-2005 at 20:01 you (Handsome Jack Morrison) wrote: >> But only after I drop by my church and say a little prayer. > :-) > So, how are things going? Well, I haven't shot anyone yet. > D

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-06 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 3:43:11 PM, you wrote: [] >> Hi, Gorgeous! > Oh, my! You certainly do know the way to the hearts of 78-year-old > women! I happen to like older women. Especially when they know as much about TB as you do. Care to join me for drinks? My wife will be joining us, of cou

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-06 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 1:54:27 PM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome! Hi, Gorgeous! [] > Sorry. It says that you should write to Support at The Bat! Tell them > about your purchase of the key from CifNet. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Okay, thanks. I just wrote them. [] > Hope your time-out with beer wa

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-06 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 12:54:26 PM, you wrote: > Hallo Roelof, > On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 18:39:58 +0200GMT (6-8-2005, 18:39 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: RO>> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\RegistrationBlock > After some testing I found that this is the one you need. Roelef, how do

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-06 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 12:23:01 PM, you wrote: > Hello Handsome! > On Saturday, August 06, 2005, 11:11 AM, you wrote: >> How can I get this resolved? > RL will sell you a new key, IIRC, for about $3.00, if you have > completely lost your key that you got for 3.xx. Mary, I'd gladly pay $3.00

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-06 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 12:39:58 PM, you wrote: > Hallo Jack, > On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:11:14 -0400GMT (6-8-2005, 18:11 +0200, where I > live), you wrote: JM>> However, it won't accept my registration key. > Did you make a copy of your registry as Thomas and Alexander both > explained? Yes. >

Re[2]: Registration woes, and still trying to recover from installing vs 3.5

2005-08-06 Thread Handsome Jack Morrison
Saturday, August 6, 2005, 12:23:32 PM, you wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 12:11 -0400, Handsome Jack Morrison wrote: >> How can I get this resolved? > You can restore the registry backup you've made, it will contain the > registration information. But I have to restore all of it or none of it,

Re[2]: registration code

2004-09-16 Thread Razgo
Mary> So did mine. From: Mary> The Bat! v3 Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (RITLABS) Mary> But I wondered whether it wasn't an automated letter, and the place to Mary> start about a non-arriving key might not be with the place one paid Mary> for it. Mary> Element5, from whom I bought mine, said that

Re[2]: registration code

2004-09-14 Thread Razgo
Hello Mary, Friday, September 10, 2004, 8:52:00 AM, you wrote: Mary> Hello Joe! Mary> On Thursday, September 09, 2004, 4:46 PM, you wrote: J>> Ok, So if the e-mail addresses from the help menu are not valid J>> anymore, where do we send requests for help or information. J>> I have not receiv

Re[2]: Registration issues with new user

2004-09-08 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Doug, On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 5:36:58 AM, you wrote: > Hi Michael, [snipped] TB! keeps its mail in standard Unix mailboxes - you can read you mail in any text editor. I know it's fixed now but you only need to open the inbox in a text editor and do a search for some likely key w

Re[2]: Registration question

2004-05-19 Thread Nick OHare
Hello Marck, Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 8:34:49 PM, you wrote: MDP> Dear Nick, MDP> @18-May-2004, 20:30 -0400 (19-May 01:30 UK time) Nick OHare [NO] in MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: NO>> The only other thing I can think may be complicating this is that I NO>> downloaded and set up the Bat! v. 1.

Re[2]: Registration woes

2003-09-05 Thread Jack Morrison
Friday, September 5, 2003, 5:14:42 PM, you wrote: > 2.00 is _way_ more sluggish than 1.63 b/9 on my system - and any bugs in > that version don't concern me (actually, there are more bugs that annoy > me in 2.00 than in any other version I've tried - except the one with > the messed up subject [th

Re: Re[2]: Registration

2003-06-13 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Jernej, On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:51:34 +0200 Jernej Simonèiè wrote: [...] > (?i)\A\:?(\s*\[.*\]\s)?(\s*(re|ha|rcpt|fwd| fw|fw|aw)%- > (\[\d*\])?:*)*(.*) This is the relevant part. As far as I can see this strips 're', 'fwd' ... etc, followed by maybe '[]' plus potentially ':'s. So in worst cas

Re[2]: Registration

2003-06-13 Thread Jernej Simonèiè
On Friday, June 13, 2003, 17:39:23, Peter Palmreuther wrote: >> It's the regex... > Absolutely sure??? I can't imagine how a regex that formerly took care > of a special character following 'Re' suddenly hits _any_ char after > 'Re'. Here's what I've been using (no %SingleRe macro anywhere): %s

Re[2]: Registration question

2002-01-17 Thread ETM
I think I am going to go eat some worms. I registered last night. Elaine > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Hi Peter, > On 17 January 2002 at 21:31:08 +0100 (which was 20:31 where I > live)Peter Palmreuther wrote to Nicholas on TBUDL and made these > points: N>>> i just re

Re[2]: Registration question

2002-01-16 Thread Nicholas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello GJim, Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 8:32:15 PM, you wrote: G> Howdy Nicholas, G> Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 6:27:27 PM, G> you wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> Hello tbudl, >> when should my registration arr

Re[2]: registration key

2002-01-13 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Joseph! JM> I have the same problem. I sent a note to ritlabs on the 7th but I JM> think they may have a blackhole over there as I never got a reply. I've managed your registration key to be re-sent to you. -- Maxim Masiutin http://www.ritlabs.com/ -- __

Re[2]: registration key

2002-01-10 Thread prayan
Hello Michal, Thursday, January 10, 2002, 2:12:34 PM, you wrote: MK> B-stok/PL, 10 Jan 2002 MK> Hello Joseph, MK> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, at 13:11:41 (which was 22:11 where I live) you wrote: JM>> I have the same problem. I sent a note to ritlabs on the 7th but I

Re[2]: registration key

2002-01-10 Thread prayan
Hello Joseph, Thursday, January 10, 2002, 1:11:41 PM, you wrote: JM> I have the same problem. I sent a note to ritlabs on the 7th but I JM> think they may have a blackhole over there as I never got a reply. JM> -joe JM> Wednesday, January 09, 2002, 10:39:49 PM, you wrote: p>> Slightly off

Re[2]: Registration Question (boxed ver.)

2002-01-01 Thread Don Zeigler
On 2:24 AM, David van Zuijlekom wrote: > I don't know but I received my registration number within two hours. But I > didn't buy the boxed version and I bought it on internet from a computer > store nearby. I made a few telephone calls and I was up and running within > two hours. I registered th

Re[2]: Registration File

2000-07-28 Thread Jamie Dainton [Work]
Hello Tom, Friday, July 28, 2000, 8:06:29 AM, you wrote: SL>> Uhm... Why? No need to reformat the hard drive just to reinstall SL>> windows. Just delete the Windows directory. xdelete or xdel is the command. TP> xdel in DR-DOS, deltree since MS-DOS 5 I think... Just picking nits. TP>

Re: Re[2]: Registration Question

1999-11-16 Thread Mary Suma
UNSUBSCRIBE *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 11/17/99 at 2:48 PM Thomas Fernandez wrote: >Hi tracer, > >on Wednesday, November 17, 1999, 2:32:10 PM GMT+0800, tracer wrote: > >Thomas>> my friend registered TB but did not get the registration details as he >Thomas>> requests below. A

Re[2]: Registration Question

1999-11-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi tracer, on Wednesday, November 17, 1999, 2:32:10 PM GMT+0800, tracer wrote: Thomas>> my friend registered TB but did not get the registration details as he Thomas>> requests below. As my own registration was so long ago, I don't Thomas>> remember whether I got an email with the Key and Checks