Re: PGP (was: Re[2]: Signatures.)

2002-07-17 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi Chris, On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 08:07:44 +0100, you wrote: > PGP - This is something I've been looking into and may need to start a > new thread on it. I'm thinking of adding PGP to my messages, but is it > more hassle than it's worth? ie. sending the key to friends etc. > Sorry if this is a bit ig

Re[2]: Signatures.

2002-07-16 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Jonathan, On Tuesday, July 16, 2002 16:29 your local time, which was 22:29 my local time, Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote; JA> (that is --) As you can see from the below, it seems to be working fine. Thanks for that :-) JA> That is a signature delimiter. When you use that, anything below it is

Re[2]: Signatures.

2002-07-16 Thread Dave in Phoenix
I've been wondering about the tiny print grey signatures also. Using the normal bat viewer for example Nick Andriash's signature and all beyond including the bat links for FAQ etc tiny grey. Best wishes Dave in Phoenix http://www.libchrist.com ___

Re[2]: Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open a message)

2002-03-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Pete, > Personal mails, of course, are a totally different thing. Forgot to say that I agree with this. Same as with business or company email. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.53d ** Scanned

Re[2]: Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open a message)

2002-03-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hi Pete > I *strongly* agree with Miguel. Thanks mate, I though I was all alone on this "crusade" . Maybe it's just because it's Saturday. > ...the "I'm me, really"-stuff... LOL :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.53d

Re[2]: Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open a message)

2002-03-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hi Nik, > Not to an appreciable amount using PGP or GPG Depends on what "appreciable" means for you and for me. How long is a piece of rope? How many grains make a pile of rice? ;-) > but certainly with S/MIME because every signed message includes the > Public Key as well To me, if something i

Re: Re[2]: Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open a message)

2002-03-02 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002 16:47:20 +0100 "Miguel A. Urech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like the (various) intros in messages, although I use the pure, > > short, informational one only. > > I don't mind the intros themselves. Although I hardly really pay > attention to any of them, some of them ar

Re[2]: Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open a message)

2002-03-02 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hi Dierk, >> I missed it, I joined this list about a month ago. > Luckily the archives are quite good. ;-) Yes, I know they quite good. But I don't have the time now. > More or less the same as signing an ordinary letter or contract. Understand. I can understand that to sign a contract you nee

Re[2]: Signatures; Margins/wrapping

2000-12-20 Thread OK3
Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Thursday, December 21, 2000, Nick Andriash wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about Signatures; Margins/wrapping: BS>> A paragraph is recognized by TB only if there is a blank line between BS>> them. So, this is an example for a 'uncorrect' paragraph. NA> I don't belie

Re[2]: Signatures

2000-07-05 Thread Zipper
Hello Ming-Li, Wednesday, July 05, 2000, 2:09:26 PM, you wrote: ML> If you hardcode the word "Zipper" and its email address in the reply ML> template, then no, TB! won't change it. If you use the macro ML> %FromFName and %FromAddr, and you change the Account before typing ML> anything in the mes