Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Thursday, May 17, 2001, Jamie Dainton wrote to Christian Dysthe about
The Bat! Lite?:
JD> I never thought I'd do this but I'm going to recommend a Microsoft
JD> product. If you need a basic e-mail client with no
JD> advanced^H^H^H^H features the
C> But as a selling point to get people to buy TB!, after a 30 day fully
C> functional evaluation period, the "Lite" version would become default
C> until a valid license is purchased.
C> I applaud Stefan and Max for producing and continually updating an
C> excellant product and believe they we
Hello Jason,
The Bat! would not be just another mail reader having these features
removed: It is small and fast and stable.
Remember that I am not talking about removing these features for the
ones needing them. I am talking about a slimmed down version.
Wednesday, May 16, 2001, 3:24:32 PM, you
Hello Sven,
i am NOT talking about removing the current version. I am just
suggesting a slimmer version in addition.
Slimming the code making The Bat! smaller would not be to save HD
space! :) Slimmer code often makes things faster and saves resources.
That is what I want: Performance, a GT mode
Hello Avenarius,
again, I am NOT suggesting removing it from the current version. I am
talking about adding a lite version.
Wednesday, May 16, 2001, 3:39:16 PM, you wrote:
A> A Bat-fellow, Christian Dysthe,
A> wrote on Wednesday, May 16, 2001 at 14:31:46 (GMT -0500),
A> which was 21:31 in Brat
Hi,
Yes, I agree with Cricket here. Having a Lite
version of The Bat for unregistered users will
bring in many more potential users. In fact, I
think the best time to do this would be when v2.0
of The Bat is released. v2.0 will be for the
registered users, while Bat Lite (based on v1.x code
base)
6 matches
Mail list logo
