Re[2]: "failure notice"

2002-04-09 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello Brien, Tuesday, April 9, 2002, 4:08:23 PM, you wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Allie C Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:44 PM >> To: Pietro Iacono on TBUDL >> Subject: Re: "failure notice" >> >> >> >> Isn't one of the basic rules to preve

Re[2]: "failure notice"

2002-04-09 Thread William Moore
Hello Roelof Thank you for your email dated Tuesday, April 9, 2002, 6:57:04 PM, in which you wrote: PI>> Is it possible to create a template that looks like the message that PI>> server automatically sends when an address doesn't exist? RO> Sure. Just create a template for the auto-reply of

Re[2]: failure notice ??

2001-09-02 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck On 01 September 2001 at 13:52:21 +0100 (which was 13:52 where I live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote MDP> Guess who forgot to turn off the MultiPOP collector for the very same MDP> free-online account!!! ROTFLMAO !! If I see it again I will giv

Re[2]: failure notice ??

2001-09-01 Thread Jernej Simončič
Hello Marck, 1. september 2001, 14:52:21, you wrote: fwn>> For some reasons, Marck's server (MDaemon) do some header rewriting, fwn>> (i.e rewrite return-path header) which cause this problem. MDP> Correct. The fault was all mine ... now corrected. Apologies to all MDP> those affected - all sho