On Saturday, May 31, 2003, 5:14:58 PM, Carsten Thönges wrote:
CT> You can use %REPLYTO="" in your templates. That blanks the
CT> Reply-To: field.
Aha - an excellent idea. I'll have to try that. In the meantime, since
this folder is for a list, and the replies always go to
On Saturday, May 31, 2003, 1:22:16 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
RO> So your only option would be to empty the account reply-to and
RO> fill in those that are necessary for good behaviour.
A good suggestion, but I just wanted to do that for one folder.
Thanks.
ztrader
__
* ztrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way to have a missing or blank Reply-to: field in the
> headers for certain folders?
You can use %REPLYTO="" in your templates. That blanks the Reply-To:
field.
--
Carsten
_
Hallo ztrader,
On Sat, 31 May 2003 11:38:49 -0700GMT (31-5-03, 20:38 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO>> Two ways: 1) Empty the Reply-To header at account properties,
RO>> 2) Empty the reply-to header at the folder properties, that way all
z> It seems as though the field can't be blank. If I s
On Friday, May 30, 2003, 1:43:46 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
RO> Hallo ztrader,
RO> On Thu, 29 May 2003 21:45:31 -0700GMT (30-5-03, 6:45 +0200, where I
RO> live), you wrote:
z>> Is there a way to have a missing or blank Reply-to: field in the
z>> headers for certain folders?
On Friday, May 30, 2003, 1:43:45 AM, Roelof Otten wrote:
RO> Hallo ztrader,
RO> On Thu, 29 May 2003 21:45:31 -0700GMT (30-5-03, 6:45 +0200, where I
RO> live), you wrote:
z>> Is there a way to have a missing or blank Reply-to: field in the
z>> headers for certain folders?
Hallo ztrader,
On Thu, 29 May 2003 21:45:31 -0700GMT (30-5-03, 6:45 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
z> Is there a way to have a missing or blank Reply-to: field in the
z> headers for certain folders?
Two ways:
1) Empty the Reply-To header at account properties, that way all your
messa
Is there a way to have a missing or blank Reply-to: field in the
headers for certain folders?
TIA,
ztrader
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hallo Mary,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 22:41:02 -0600GMT (25-1-03, 5:41 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
MB> However, other subscribers to TBUDL are saying that properly
MB> written List protocols will over-ride a Poster's "reply to"
MB> configuration.
It's not really a matter of properly written pr
g so Mary. On Rootsweb the listowner's decision is final!
A> Actually I think you'll find Joan is an AOL user of many year's
A> standing ;-)
Well, I knew that she didn't know anything about The Bat! She said so
herself when I was asking her how I could put the Reply To fiel
Tuesday, January 21, 2003, 5:46:08 PM, Mary wrote:
MB> I don't think I want to get into a discussion with the
MB> moderator on her List settings at this point. The level of experience,
MB> even with her, is, I think, Outlook Express.
No point doing so Mary. On Rootsweb the listowner's decision
Monday, January 20, 2003, 7:45:47 PM, Thomas wrote:
>> The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
>> over-riding her List settings.
TF> I don't think that you can override her settings, but you could try to
TF> use the %Reply-To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" macro in your templat
Hello Joseph!
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, 1:36 PM, you wrote:
MB>> Good teaching goes from the known to the unknown
J> Very nice.
Fellow teacher?
At least, fellow Bat lover. I noted your version in your expanded
headers. ;)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! 1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Servic
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, Mary Bull wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
MB> Good teaching goes from the known to the unknown
Very nice.
--
JN
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.c
Hello Spike!
On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, 8:16 AM, you wrote:
S> 8< Snipped a bunch
MB>> ... this [Senior-Newbies] is a very nice list. ...
< snipped a bunch more ... >
MB>> ... Hardly any of them have heard of The Bat! however. :) ...
S> You must take this opportunity to edu-ma-cate the
Hello Mary Bull,
On or about Monday, January 20, 2003 at 14:12:32GMT -0600 (which
was 3:12 PM in the tropics where I live) Mary Bull opined:
8< Snipped a bunch
MB> Peter, this is a very nice list. Some of the people on it know even
MB> less than I, and I'm sometimes able to help fellow Senio
Hello Mary,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:57:13 -0600 GMT (21/01/03, 02:57 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
T>> I don't think that you can override her settings, but you could try to
T>> use the %Reply-To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" macro in your templates for
T>> that list.
> Thanks, Thomas. Put the list address
Hi Heiko,
on Mon, 20 Jan 2003 21:59:32 +0100GMT (20.01.03, 21:59 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>> It is only a work-around, but it is easier than to have them change their
>> list-server software. Actually, _their_ Reply-to entry should override your
>> o
Hallo Peter Meyns,
am Montag, 20. Januar 2003 schriebst Du:
> It is only a work-around, but it is easier than to have them change their
> list-server software. Actually, _their_ Reply-to entry should override your
> own (if existent) on the list...
Well, I once learned that this was deliberate
Hi Mary,
on Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:12:32 -0600GMT (20.01.03, 21:12 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MB>>> The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
MB>>> over-riding her List settings.
P>> Yes, it is in Account -- Properties -- Gene
Hi Thomas,
on Tue, 21 Jan 2003 02:45:47 +0700GMT (20.01.03, 20:45 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
>> The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
>> over-riding her List settings.
TF> I don't think that you can override her setting
Hello Peter!
On Monday, January 20, 2003, 2:03 PM, you wrote:
P> Hi Mary,
MB>> I just subscribed to an interesting (to me) new list, Rootsweb's
MB>> Senior-Newbies-L.
MB>> The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
MB>> over-riding her List settings.
P> Yes, it is
n The Bat! seems to be
MB> causing my Reply To field not to show. Consequently, many who choose
MB> to reply to my posts are sending the replies to me privately, when
MB> they are really meaning to post their replies to the list.
MB> The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, January 20, 2003, 1:45 PM, you wrote:
MB>> The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
MB>> over-riding her List settings.
T> I don't think that you can override her settings, but you could try to
T> use the %Reply-To="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" macro i
Hello Mary,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:41:09 -0600 GMT (21/01/03, 02:41 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
> The list moderator, Joan Young, says that something in my settings is
> over-riding her List settings.
I don't think that you can override her settings, but you could try to
use the %Reply-To="[EMA
Hello All!
I just subscribed to an interesting (to me) new list, Rootsweb's
Senior-Newbies-L.
Something about the settings I have made in The Bat! seems to be
causing my Reply To field not to show. Consequently, many who choose
to reply to my posts are sending the replies to me privately,
On 26-10-2000 at 09:46, Michal Kozusznik kindly wrote:
> BTW: Is there possibility to view source of mail using TB!? Message
> header field sometimes gives not enough information.
Shift-Ctrl-K (view RFC-822 headers) shows you all the
headers available.
- K -
--
The First Amendment presup
Hello Ming-Li,
Thursday, October 26, 2000, 12:10:29 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
> Correction: just found the Reply-to field set in my folder
> properties. If it's all cleared (no Reply-to setting in either
> account properties, folder properties, or any template), then TB
> leaves i
On Wednesday, October 25, 2000, 1:49:43 PM, Ming-Li wrote:
>> I've checked, TB! sets Reply-to field if this one and From field
>> have different addresses. If there are the same, Reply-to field
>> is not set. Are there some hints?
> Are you sure? Here TB always se
Ming-Li wrote:
>> Is it possible to set Reply-to field the same as From field ???
> TB does this automatically unless you set it otherwise through a
> template.
Which is by the way not a good idea. Whenever you create a new
account, the fields for "Reply-To"
On Wednesday, October 25, 2000, 1:50:59 AM, Michal wrote:
> Is it possible to set Reply-to field the same as From field
> ???
TB does this automatically unless you set it otherwise through a
template.
> It could be useful when I send mail to the mailing-list
> asking
Hello,
Is it possible to set Reply-to field the same as From field ??? It
could be useful when I send mail to the mailing-list asking for
private answer. List-server should NOT overwrite Reply-to, so Reply on
this mail will be addressed to me directly.
I've checked, TB! sets
32 matches
Mail list logo
