Hi Lars, hi list,
* Lars Geiger (LG) writes:
LG> Apart from that, ZA _can_ cause trouble. That's my personal experience
LG> with that software on various systems of friends, and all problems could
LG> easily be solved by ZoneAlarm'S uninstall routine.
Full ACK.
http://www.blood-thirsty-barbari
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Miguel A. Urech wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> > I should correct myself I guess... I've not seen ZoneAlarm correcting file
> > extensions because 'it' thought they were 'harmful'. That to me would be
> > more of an inconvenience than a feature... especially the amount of fiels
Hello Jonathan,
> I should correct myself I guess... I've not seen ZoneAlarm correcting file
> extensions because 'it' thought they were 'harmful'. That to me would be
> more of an inconvenience than a feature... especially the amount of fiels
> I get sent.
Do you think that the Options/Prefere
On Mon, 6 May 2002, tracer wrote:
> Hello Lars Geiger,
> On Sun, 5 May 2002 22:44:41 +0200 GMT your local time,
> which was Monday, May 6, 2002, 3:44:41 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
>
> GAK>> I've been using ZoneAlarm for more than 18 months without any
> GAK>> trouble. I think it's great. Ther
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Michael Disabato wrote:
> Sunday, May 5, 2002, 1:55:34 PM, Jonathan scribbled:
>
> JA> On Sun, 5 May 2002, Michael Kellogg wrote:
>
> >> For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
> >> people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-bla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 1:55:34 PM, Jonathan scribbled:
JA> On Sun, 5 May 2002, Michael Kellogg wrote:
>> For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
>> people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank
>> HTM
Hello Lars Geiger,
On Sun, 5 May 2002 22:44:41 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, May 6, 2002, 3:44:41 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Lars Geiger wrote:
> Hi Georg,
> On Sunday, May 5, 2002 at 21:34:10 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
GAK>> I've been using ZoneAlarm for more than 18 months w
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On Sun, 5 May 2002 21:39:20 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, May 6, 2002, 2:39:20 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>> one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is
>> a ".zl?" file, where "?" = 3 or 9 usuall
Hello Lars Geiger,
On Sun, 5 May 2002 21:00:11 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, May 6, 2002, 2:00:11 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Lars Geiger wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> On Sunday, May 5, 2002 at 11:25:18 [GMT -0700], you wrote:
MK>> For some reason I have been getting emails - no do
I should correct myself I guess... I've not seen ZoneAlarm correcting file
extensions because 'it' thought they were 'harmful'. That to me would be
more of an inconvenience than a feature... especially the amount of fiels
I get sent.
My apologise for causing any confusion ;)
On Sun, 5 May 2002,
Hi stuart,
On Sunday, May 5, 2002 at 21:53:45 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
LG>> The problem with a "personal firewall" is that the security it can
LG>> offer is rather limited (or "almost 0").
sw> Care to back that statement up with some evidence?
Most of this was already in my last message, althoug
Hello Lars,
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 9:44:41 PM, you wrote:
LG> The problem with a "personal firewall" is that the security it can offer
LG> is rather limited (or "almost 0"). These kind of programs make a user
LG> believe that (s)he has installed a "really effective" program to protect
LG> his/her
Hi Georg,
On Sunday, May 5, 2002 at 21:34:10 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
GAK> I've been using ZoneAlarm for more than 18 months without any
GAK> trouble. I think it's great. There are a couple of alternatives
GAK> (like Tiny),
The problem with a "personal firewall" is that the security it can offer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 05, 2002, at 11:25:18 AM PST, Michael Kellogg wrote:
> ...with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank HTML file, one is some
> decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is a ".zl?" file, where
> "?" = 3 or 9 usually.
As Miguel mentio
Hello Michael,
> one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is
> a ".zl?" file, where "?" = 3 or 9 usually.
The zl? extensions are because they have been quarantined by
ZoneAlarm.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
LG> A .zl? file is created by ZoneAlarm, which changes the extension of
LG> certain attachments on incoming messages as a security measure. IMHO,
LG> you should get rid of that program. This will save you much trouble.
I've been using ZoneAlarm for
Hi Michael,
On Sunday, May 5, 2002 at 11:25:18 [GMT -0700], you wrote:
MK> For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
MK> people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank
MK> HTML file, one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one
MK> is a
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Michael Kellogg wrote:
> For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
> people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank
> HTML file, one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is
> a ".zl?" file, where "?" = 3 or 9 usua
For some reason I have been getting emails - no doubt viruses - from
people I don't even know, with 3 attachments: One is an almost-blank
HTML file, one is some decoy file, like a jpg or Word doc, and one is
a ".zl?" file, where "?" = 3 or 9 usually.
I created a filter that processes incoming mai
19 matches
Mail list logo
