Domagoj-
try http://www.stunnel.org
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
--
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Dear Domagoj,
On 16:13 01.08.2003, you [Domagoj Klepac] wrote...
> On the same server, with same settings, secure connection works for
> IMAP. I've tried messing with authorization options, but it didn't
> help. Why is that log so brief, it doesn't even report connecting to
> server or anything (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does anyone use TB! for retrieving messages from server with POP3 and
secure connection (STARTLS)?
Both secure to regular and dedicated port end up with this:
===8<===[ Begin paste ]=
31/07/2003, 13:44:18: FET
Hello James!
On Friday, December 27, 2002 at 7:17:32 AM you wrote:
> Does "version 2" have any anticipated release date?
Somewhere in the future. Sorry, the only thing known about the release
date is that the developers wok hard on it.
> Hopefully soon? I keep hearing of people reporting proble
Hello Dierk,
DH> Version 2 is said to have complete IMAP support.
I too fell victim to spending hours trying to figure out why my newly
installed stunnnel and openssl programs and libraries were not working
with TheBat. They don't work with Eudora either. But, they work just
fine with Outlook. I
Hello Aldo,
Thursday, December 26, 2002, 7:17:42 AM, you wrote:
APSA> Dear all, we are attempting to use TheBat (v 1.62) to a secure
APSA> IMAP server at the university campus.
APSA> I dont know how many hours I have lost in this matter. There is
Very sorry to hear.
APSA> no way I can connect.
Hello Luigi!
On Thursday, December 26, 2002 at 1:55:59 PM you wrote:
> It's not just IMAP problem. The same happens with POP3 using TLS protocol.
> I had to get and installa manually the certificate of my ISP in order to
> establish a secure communication.
> Is this a missing feature, or is a d
Hello Dierk,
Thursday, December 26, 2002, 11:59:20 AM, you wrote:
DH> Well, TB 1.x does support IMAP only very rudimentary, it will connect
DH> to the server and download mail. Actually IMAP in TB is currently
DH> nothing more than POP3 via IMAP server.
DH> Version 2 is said to have complete IMAP
Hello Aldo!
On Thursday, December 26, 2002 at 11:47:42 AM you wrote:
> Could you advice, please, on what I should do ?
Well, TB 1.x does support IMAP only very rudimentary, it will connect
to the server and download mail. Actually IMAP in TB is currently
nothing more than POP3 via IMAP server.
Dear all, we are attempting to use TheBat (v 1.62) to a secure
IMAP server at the university campus.
I dont know how many hours I have lost in this matter. There is
no way I can connect. I have tested all of the alternatives but
it wont go.
Netscape Mail and Outlook Express are really lousy progr
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 at 8:36 PM Peter Palmreuther wrote:
|
|KG> have also heard that one can create his own certificate using OpenSSL.
|
|You will not need to build a certificate.
|You'll only need the public part of servers key to have imported into your
|address book into 'Trusted Root CA' part.
Hello Kai,
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002 at 10:28:18 AM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
KG> have also heard that one can create his own certificate using OpenSSL.
You will not need to build a certificate.
You'll only need the public part of servers key t
Hi:
I would like to connect to my university's secure POP3 server via SSL
but have no clue how to create my own certificate, how to import the
server's certificate and what the deal with the "Intermediate Root CA"
and "Trusted Root CA" directories is. I am aware tha
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 16:39:17 +0100GMT (11/12/2001, 23:39 +0800GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
PP> No. I had problems learning this by myself, but it is
PP> "Authentication" :-)
PP> (I guess you're used to the German word 'Authentifizierung'
Yes. ;-) This is what my last English teach
Hi Dierk,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:49:18 +0100GMT (11/12/2001, 22:49 +0800GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
>> On a side remark: Shouldn't this be "Authentification"?
DH> Not according to Longman's DCE the OED - there is no such word. It
DH> goes back to the plural stem of the Latin "authenticare".
I wo
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:41:20 -0800GMT (12/12/2001, 01:41 +0800GMT),
Alexander Jason wrote:
AJ> NOTE: TB (v153d) does NOT have this type of common authentication.
AJ> Here is a reply from Stefan:
>> We are working on it right now. Before we get it implemented,
>> you can use the pr
ive me if this has been discussed
> I you always ask for forgiveness, did it ever come to mind that there
> is an archive to search?
>> Is SECURE POP3 possible with TB -- or will it SOON be possible? My mail server has
>been
>> switched to ATTBI and it requires Secure POP3.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander!
On 11 Dec 2001 at 18:41:20 you wrote:
> I'm new to the list so please forgive me if this has been discussed
I you always ask for forgiveness, did it ever come to mind that there
is an archive to search?
> Is SECURE PO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 21:18:00 +0800GMT (which was 14:18 +0100GMT where I live),
Thomas F thought about "Secure POP3 ?" and wrote:
AJ>> I'm new to the list so please forgive me if this has been discussed . . ..
TF> I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On 11 Dec 2001 at 14:18:00 you wrote:
> On a side remark: Shouldn't this be "Authentification"?
Not according to Longman's DCE the OED - there is no such word. It
goes back to the plural stem of the Latin "authenticare".
- --
Dierk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter!
On 11 Dec 2001 at 16:39:17 you wrote:
> (I guess you're used to the German word 'Authentifizierung' but as I
> had to check by myself the 'fi' is not contained in the English
> version :-))).
This, BTW, is a very interesting example fo
Hello Thomas,
On 11 Dec 2001 at 14:18:00 you wrote (at least in part):
TF> On a side remark: Shouldn't this be "Authentification"?
No. I had problems learning this by myself, but it is
"Authentication" :-)
(I guess you're used to the German word 'Authentifizierung' but as I
had to check by my
Best is to start a new
enquiry by using the "new message" feature in TB.
AJ> Is SECURE POP3 possible with TB -- or will it SOON be possible? My mail server has
been
AJ> switched to ATTBI and it requires Secure POP3.
AJ> How is it that Outlook and many other mail clients have
I'm new to the list so please forgive me if this has been discussed . . ..
Is SECURE POP3 possible with TB -- or will it SOON be possible? My mail server has been
switched to ATTBI and it requires Secure POP3.
How is it that Outlook and many other mail clients have this and we don't .
Hello Nick Andriash,
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000 11:28:54 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, June 05, 2000, 1:28:54 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Nick Andriash wrote:
> On Sunday, June 04, 2000, 8:12:27 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH>> I just want to know if I'm to stupid to find it: Is there an
JMP> Now sure, GMX cannot provide a shell for every of it's customers, but
JMP> if you need encrypted transmission of your eMails from your POP3 box
JMP> to your client, you'd also consider a SSH tunnel. You've got the
JMP> choice between both, and personally I prefer SSH with port forwarding
JMP
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000 11:28:54 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
NA> That is not to be confused however, with my wish for a better
NA> alternative to MS Windows... it's just that Linux isn't it. :o)
I like that. I feel exactly the same way about Linux. It's a
poor desktop solution at this time.
Hallo Dierk,
Sunday, June 04, 2000, 5:12:27 PM, you wrote:
DH> I just want to know if I'm to stupid to find it: Is there an option
DH> to make your POP3 connection a secure SSL one? My mail provider
DH> will support this in a few days and I'd like to use it, so if it is
DH> not an option
Servus Jast,
Am 04.06.2000 so gegen 20:39 meintest Du:
> Nope. With APOP your password is encrypted when you log on. SSL encrypts
> the actual data during transfer. Bat doesn't support this.
Now sure, GMX cannot provide a shell for every of it's customers, but
if you need encrypted transmissi
Morning Nick Andriash,
> [] Encrypted logon (APOP/MD5)
>
> It's probably not the same thing, is it.
Nope. With APOP your password is encrypted when you log on. SSL encrypts
the actual data during transfer. Bat doesn't support this.
--
.. Jast ... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: using TB 1.44
:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, June 04, 2000, 8:12:27 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH> I just want to know if I'm to stupid to find it: Is there an option
DH> to make your POP3 connection a secure SSL one? My mail provider
DH> will support this in a few days and I'd li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL!
I just want to know if I'm to stupid to find it: Is there an option
to make your POP3 connection a secure SSL one? My mail provider
will support this in a few days and I'd like to use it, so if it is
not an option with TB!, pleas
32 matches
Mail list logo
