At 8:54:51 PM on Thursday, September 28, 2000, your quill inscribed unto the ether:
the problem is that most of the more 'intelligent' defrag programs try
not only to defrag but organise storage based on some usage criteria.
snip illuminating post
Actually, I hadn't even thought of the
Marco,
Regarding your message dated: 29 September 2000...
MQ I don't think that OODefrag actually uses one, or if it does it's
MQ not configurable, unlike, say, the one used by Norton's Speeddisk.
If you investigate the various OO defrag options, you can choose to
defrag the system by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marco,
On 29 September 2000 at 07:49:43 GMT -0400 (which was 12:49 where I
live) Marco Qualizza wrote and made these points on the subject
of "NTFS defragging (was: Slow changing folders)":
MQ snip illuminating post
MQ Actually, I h
Hello Marco Qualizza,
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:24:45 -0400 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, September 28, 2000, 2:24:45 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marco Qualizza wrote:
How do you defrag NTFS disks? Do you use DiskKeeper?
perfect disk.
And obviously MS claim is untrue(g).
How well
Hello Karin Spaink,
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 20:45:09 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, September 25, 2000, 1:45:09 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Karin Spaink wrote:
On 24-09-2000 at 20:33, Deryk Lister kindly wrote:
g Nevertheless, I defrag my disk every month or so. The way output
How do you defrag NTFS disks? Do you use DiskKeeper?
perfect disk.
And obviously MS claim is untrue(g).
How well do DiskKeeper and Perfect Disk work? If you've tried OODefrag
(which is what I'm using), how do they work in comparison? (OODefrag
can be found at: http://www.oosoft.de/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:52:21 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
DL Using NTFS here, but it seems that Microsoft's old claims of it being
DL non-fraggable are untrue :)
TF I never used NT, so I would have to read up on NTFS. "Non-fraggable"?
TF Never
Hi Mark,
Sunday, September 24, 2000, 8:11:08 PM, you wrote:
MRH As a point of interest... I believe that Win2K installs on an NTFS
MRH cluster size of 4K by default so this should help prevent the same
MRH type of problem occurring quite so readily - hooray for all users of
MRH Win2K!
I think
I'm sure this was mentioned before, but can't find where.
My inbox has only 233 messages in it, but when I switch to it from a
different folder it can sit chugging at the disk for 10-15 seconds
before actually showing the contents! Perhaps it's fragmented or
something, is there a command to
My inbox has only 233 messages in it, but when I switch to it from a
different folder it can sit chugging at the disk for 10-15 seconds
before actually showing the contents! Perhaps it's fragmented or
something, is there a command to 'defrag' the database? I don't
fancy devoting the day to
DL Now opens in half a second, and saved 98 megs!
g Nevertheless, I defrag my disk every month or so. The way output
onto disk works, it makes good sense. ;-)
Using NTFS here, but it seems that Microsoft's old claims of it being
non-fraggable are untrue :)
--
Deryk Lister || ICQ 25869912
On 24-09-2000 at 20:33, Deryk Lister kindly wrote:
g Nevertheless, I defrag my disk every month or so. The way output
onto disk works, it makes good sense. ;-)
Using NTFS here, but it seems that Microsoft's old claims of it being
non-fraggable are untrue :)
How do you defrag NTFS disks? Do
Karin,
Regarding your message dated: 24 September 2000...
Using NTFS here, but it seems that Microsoft's old claims of it being
non-fraggable are untrue :)
No - NTFS as implemented in Windows NT does fragment because (as far
as I understand it) it uses quite a large default cluster size on
Hi Karin,
On Sunday 24/09/2000 at 19:45, you wrote:
Using NTFS here, but it seems that Microsoft's old claims of it being
non-fraggable are untrue :)
How do you defrag NTFS disks? Do you use DiskKeeper?
I'm running Win2000, which finally has Defrag built in :) It's
actually just a version
Hi Deryk,
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 19:33:08 +0100GMT (25/09/2000, 02:33 +0800GMT),
Deryk Lister wrote:
g Nevertheless, I defrag my disk every month or so. The way output
onto disk works, it makes good sense. ;-)
DL Using NTFS here, but it seems that Microsoft's old claims of it being
DL
15 matches
Mail list logo
