Lars-
Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:25:41 PM, you wrote:
LG> These are S/MIME signed messages. You are using a version which had
LG> problems with these very messages. You should upgrade to 1.61 to get
LG> these messages displayed correctly.
(slaps self in head)...thanks...I guess it's time to ba
Hi Mark,
On Monday, October 7, 2002 at 12:17:03 [GMT -0700], you wrote:
MW> once in a while I see a message with an icon of an envelope with a
MW> little check mark in the upper right-hand corner. I can't view them
MW> so I just end up deleting them.
These are S/MIME signed messages. You are usi
Bats-
I'm sure I used to know this one, but those neurons are malfunctioning
today...once in a while I see a message with an icon of an envelope
with a little check mark in the upper right-hand corner. I can't view
them so I just end up deleting them. I can't find a reference to that
icon anywher
Hello Thomas,
Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:57:36 PM, you wrote:
TF> BTW am I the only one to always ignore the priority settings?
No. I do so too.
Anyway, most of the bright red messages I get seem to be spam :-(
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000
5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 2
--
Best
Hello Julian,
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 12:18:03 +0100 GMT (06/10/02, 18:18 +0700 GMT),
Julian Beach (Lists) wrote:
JBL> The colour of incoming, unread messages, is very noticeable
JBL> (bright red, yellow or blue envelopes). It is only when the
JBL> messages have been read that the colours go pale and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
@7-Oct-2002, 00:15 -0230 (03:45 UK time) Adam [A] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP>> Options .. Preferences .. High colour images.
A> Could you be more specific? Can't spot this.
That was pretty specific. TB Main men
Hello Marck,
Sunday, October 6, 2002, 11:51:58 AM, you wrote:
MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP> Hash: SHA1
MDP> Hi Doug,
MDP> @6-Oct-2002, 14:35 Doug Weller [DW] in
MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>> ... high colour image set!
DW>> How do you choose these?
MD
Hello Marck,
Sunday, October 6, 2002, 8:58:07 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
> @6-Oct-2002, 14:28 +0200 (13:28 UK time) Marcus Ohlström [MO] in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>> Not on my 32bit colour.
MO>> Are you using the standard glyphs then?
> D'oh! But not high colour i
06 October 2002, 13:23, you wrote:
MDP> Not on my 32bit colour. Nor if I zoom-in on the zone, copy the
MDP> zoomed image, paste it into The Gimp and use the colour sampler tool
MDP> to investigate the colours. #FF, #C0C0C0 and #808080 only.
MDP> (white, silver and dark grey). No yellow. Same
Hello Marck,
On Sun, 06 Oct 2002 at 11:58:18 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
MDP> I just used a zoom tool to look closely at an open normal
MDP> priority envelope. Not a hint of a touch of yellow in there -
MDP> just white and grey pixels. :-/
It's going to depend on what glyphs each person has loaded.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug,
@6-Oct-2002, 14:35 Doug Weller [DW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> ... high colour image set!
DW> How do you choose these?
Options .. Preferences .. High colour images.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List m
Hi Marck,
Sunday, October 6, 2002, 1:58:07 PM, you wrote:
> @6-Oct-2002, 14:28 +0200 (13:28 UK time) Marcus Ohlstrm [MO] in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>> Not on my 32bit colour.
MO>> Are you using the standard glyphs then?
> D'oh! But not high colour image set! That doe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marcus,
@6-Oct-2002, 14:28 +0200 (13:28 UK time) Marcus Ohlström [MO] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Not on my 32bit colour.
MO> Are you using the standard glyphs then?
D'oh! But not high colour image set! That does it. No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marcus,
@6-Oct-2002, 14:28 +0200 (13:28 UK time) Marcus Ohlström [MO] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MO>>> At least with my 16 bits colour depth resolution.
>> Not on my 32bit colour.
MO> Are you using the standard glyphs the
On Sunday, October 6, 2002, 14:23, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MO>> At least with my 16 bits colour depth resolution.
> Not on my 32bit colour.
Are you using the standard glyphs then?
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3
PGP Public Ke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marcus,
@6-Oct-2002, 14:06 +0200 (13:06 UK time) Marcus Ohlström [MO] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MO> Do you see the red and blue parts on open high/low priority
MO> envelope?
Clearly.
MO> The same parts are yellow on the
On Sunday, October 6, 2002, 12:58, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
> I just used a zoom tool to look closely at an open normal priority
> envelope. Not a hint of a touch of yellow in there - just white and
> grey pixels. :-/
Do you see the red and blue parts on open high/low priority envelope?
The sa
On Sunday, October 6, 2002, 11:38:11 AM, Clive Taylor wrote:
> Yes, I know that Dierk. My point was that the colour indicating the
> priority of incoming messages is so pale here that I hadn't noticed it
> before.
The colour of incoming, unread messages, is very noticeable (bright
red, yellow or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Hexdump,
@6-Oct-2002, 04:45 -0400 (09:45 UK time) Hexdump [H] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Unread: Closed envelope, yellow. Read: Open envelope, white.
H> The open envelope still has a slight hint of yellow to it. (Part
H
06 October 2002, 09:24, you wrote:
DH> Unread: Closed envelope, yellow.
DH> Read: Open envelope, white
Yes, I know that Dierk. My point was that the colour indicating the
priority of incoming messages is so pale here that I hadn't noticed it
before.
--
Clive Taylor
Using The Bat! v1.61
Hello Tim,
Sunday, October 6, 2002, 4:51:26 AM, you wrote:
> On Sunday, 6 October 2002, Hexdump wrote:
H>> The open envelope still has a slight hint of yellow to it. (Part
H>> of it is yellow, and part of it is white.)
> Obviously I need to visit the optometrist again. I've never noticed
> tha
On Sunday, 6 October 2002, Hexdump wrote:
H> The open envelope still has a slight hint of yellow to it. (Part of
H> it is yellow, and part of it is white.)
Obviously I need to visit the optometrist again. I've never noticed
that.
--
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 98 4.10
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, October 6, 2002, 4:24:42 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Clive!
> On Sunday, October 6, 2002 at 8:56:39 AM you wrote:
>> I've never noticed before that 'normal' priority read messages are
>> coloured yellow. I thought they were white. Perhaps I need to
>> adjust my monitor's gamma!
Hello Clive!
On Sunday, October 6, 2002 at 8:56:39 AM you wrote:
> I've never noticed before that 'normal' priority read messages are
> coloured yellow. I thought they were white. Perhaps I need to adjust
> my monitor's gamma!
Unread: Closed envelope, yellow.
Read: Open envelope, white.
--
05 October 2002, 20:17, you wrote:
MDP> Priority: Red = High, Blue = Low, Yellow = Normal.
I've never noticed before that 'normal' priority read messages are
coloured yellow. I thought they were white. Perhaps I need to adjust
my monitor's gamma!
--
Clive Taylor
Using The Bat! v1.61
___
CW> Just for test purposes, I've set this as high priority.
Hmmm. Priority flags don't make it into digest mode. Just as well, I
guess, but Yet Another Thing To Bug The List Developers About.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.60h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
--
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Chris,
@5-Oct-2002, 11:47 -0700 (19:47 UK time) Chris Weaven [CW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
CW> Why do some envelopes appear a different colour when they appear
CW> in my inbox? Is it something to do with the importance le
Hallo Chris,
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:47:23 -0700GMT (5-10-02, 20:47 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
CW> Why do some envelopes appear a different colour when they appear in my
CW> inbox? Is it something to do with the importance level?
Yep.
High importance is red.
Normal is yellow.
Low import
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Chris Weaven [CW] wrote:'
CW> Why do some envelopes appear a different colour when they appear
CW> in my inbox? Is it something to do with the importance level?
The envelope colour indicates message pri
Hi Scott,
On Saturday, October 5, 2002 13:48 your local time, which was 11:48 my
local time, Scott McNay [SM] wrote;
CW>> Why do some envelopes appear a different colour when they appear in my
CW>> inbox? Is it something to do with the importance level?
SM> Yes, press F9 to check the header to
Hi Chris!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Saturday, October 5, 2002, 1:47:23 PM, you wrote:
CW> Why do some envelopes appear a different colour when they appear in my
CW> inbox? Is it something to do with the importance level?
Yes, press F9 to check the header to see.
Hi all,
Sorry, but I need to ask this, apologies if I appear stupid, but need to
know.
Why do some envelopes appear a different colour when they appear in my
inbox? Is it something to do with the importance level?
Thanks and apologies,
Chris Weaven
--
E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Created Using
32 matches
Mail list logo
