TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Simon
How-do-you-do list members, Rather annoying gripe. TB! executable does not have any version info. I use a shell extension that displays version info in context menu and no info on TB! So I guess we are left to guess? Slán anois, Simon send private mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Oleg Zalyalov
Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Tuesday, March 14, 2000, Simon wrote to List about TB! Version info: S Rather annoying gripe. TB! executable does not have any version info. I S use a shell extension that displays version info in context menu and no S info on TB! So I guess we are left

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Simon, On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:03:13 +GMT (14/03/2000, 19:03 +0800GMT), Simon wrote: OZ Did you try to press Alt-F1 in TB!? S Yes. I didn't mean that. I was actually talking about the properties page of S an executable. The version tab to be precise. This tab can provide you with S

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Dieter Hummel
Hello Listmembers, On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 at 11:03:13 [GMT +] Simon wrote: application. I use a shell extension to view this info as it is extremely quick, saves me having to open an application necessarily, and usually provides better details. It is a particular gripe of mine

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Simon
How-do-you-do, Thomas Fernandez posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments: TF Hi Simon, TF On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:03:13 +GMT (14/03/2000, 19:03 +0800GMT), TF Simon wrote: scissor action TF What is that? A programme? Can you tell us which one? Version Info free from

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Simon
How-do-you-do, Dieter posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments: DH(guess it's version info, contained in a collection of useful utils) Yes. It is indeed Version Info! DHand can confirm that TB lacks this information. Thanks. Slán anois, Simon send private

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Mark Aston
Hi Thomas, Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 11:43:11 AM, you wrote: TF What is that? A programme? Can you tell us which one? S quick, saves me having to open an application necessarily, and usually S provides better details. It is a particular gripe of mine that some authors S don't include this

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Simon
How-do-you-do, Mark Aston posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments: MA You actually don't need a utility to do this, if you right click the MA file in Explorer and look at properties it will show you this MA information, if it's there, in the case of TB! it's not.

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Simon, On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:36:17 + GMT (15.03.2000, 01:36 +0800 GMT), Simon wrote: MA You actually don't need a utility to do this, if you right click the MA file in Explorer and look at properties it will show you this MA information, if it's there, in the case of TB!

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Thomas, TF So, which one is the choice for these details? General rule in windows: properties is always the bottom-one :-) hth -- Der Immer

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Roel, On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 18:59:06 +0100 GMT (15.03.2000, 01:59 +0800 GMT), Roel wrote: TF So, which one is the choice for these details? R General rule in windows: R properties is always the bottom-one :-) R hth Thanks, it did. :-) And no version number for TB. -- Cheers, Thomas

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Mark Aston
Hi Simon, Tuesday, March 14, 2000, 5:36:17 PM, you wrote: MA You actually don't need a utility to do this, if you right click the MA file in Explorer and look at properties it will show you this MA information, if it's there, in the case of TB! it's not. S I take it you are not a

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 14 Mar 00, at 20:26, Mark Aston wrote about "Re: TB! Version info": S I take it you are not a big fan of speedy little shell extensions Mark :) Well since I installed W2k on my 166 *nothing* could be described as even remotely 'speedy' :-)

Re[2]: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Paul
Hello Simon, Count me in. A small gripe but still very useful information when you have several copies of beta programs. Often the point build is not enough. See the enclosed gif. TB is not displaying Product name or version all the other programs do (well almost Gravity doesn't know its

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread Simon
How-do-you-do, Paul posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] making the following comments: P Count me in. OK. After 3... :) P A small gripe but still very useful information when you have several P copies of beta programs. Often the point build is not enough. That was exactly the point I was making. P

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread tracer
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev, On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 01:05:56 +0300 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, March 15, 2000, 5:05:56 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: Hi there! On 14 Mar 00, at 20:26, Mark Aston wrote about "Re: TB! Version info": S I t

Re: TB! Version info

2000-03-14 Thread tracer
Hello Paul, On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 01:17:00 + GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, March 15, 2000, 8:17:00 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Paul wrote: Hello Simon, Count me in. A small gripe but still very useful information when you have several copies of beta programs. Often the