Re: TBUDL used for spamming

2000-03-12 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone, Responding to your article on Sunday, March 12, 2000 at 09:26:04 GMT + (which was 13/03/2000 16:26 GMT +0700 my Local Time) : JDH Not doubt you all got the same SPAM mail as I, but I wonder how JDH many of you noticed the header information: MDP I didn't

Re: TBUDL used for spamming

2000-03-12 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi tracer, On 12 March 2000 at 11:13:15 GMT +0700 (which was 04:13 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: JDH Not doubt you all got the same SPAM mail as I, but I wonder how JDH many of you noticed the header information: I didn't actually see this message. Who was the

TBUDL used for spamming

2000-03-11 Thread John De Hoog
Not doubt you all got the same SPAM mail as I, but I wonder how many of you noticed the header information: Subject: CAN BULK E-MAILING WORK 4 YOU? YOU BET***SPECIAL RATES*** Message-Id: 23111852703.SM00176@3zcSvjP0g X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TBUDL used for spamming

2000-03-11 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello John, On Sun, 12 Mar 2000 at 11:17:56 [GMT +0900], you wrote: JDH Not doubt you all got the same SPAM mail as I, but I wonder how many of JDH you noticed the header information: G. Apparently somebody took the time to subscribe to the list, and then used that subscribe address to

Re: TBUDL used for spamming

2000-03-11 Thread tracer
Hello Leif Gregory, On Sun, 12 Mar 2000 11:31:06 +0900 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, March 12, 2000, 9:31:06 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Leif Gregory wrote: Hello John, On Sun, 12 Mar 2000 at 11:17:56 [GMT +0900], you wrote: JDH Not doubt you all got the same SPAM mail as I, but I