Test Message

Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Test message, please ignore -- Best regards, - Syafril - Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama Mailto : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Voice : (62) (21) 385-1600

Test message

Forgive me for the this test message. Please ignore. -- Best regards, - Syafril - Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama Mailto : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Voice : (62) (21) 385-1600

Test Message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, This is just a test message. Please ignore. - -- - -=A. Curtis Martin=- Using TB! v1.46 Beta/3 «» Win2k Pro SP1 Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA | PGP Key ID: 0xEE079937 PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

Test Message

This is a test message. Thanks. Cheers Mark Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

test message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, This is a test message - -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBPyJzpVfJ62ArBxfiEQIcJQCgxPZDnQCDsLphxjTXMWVfohEoDh8AoKv9 sHxK2E90Hpl/Q1dV7SqoIbtL =c8WQ -END PGP SIGNATURE

Test message

Hi all, just a test -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html _ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.h

test message

Hello buds... sorry for bothering you.. but I can't get messages through so I'm testing, please delete. -- Best regards, Laura mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutai

Test message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, This is just a test message for the list which seems to have been down. - -- - Allie - ~~~ A. Curtis Martin | Moderator(TBUDL|TBBETA|TBTECH) ¡Opinions given are mine and not necessarily those of

Re: Test message

Hi there! On 28 Jan 00, at 21:52, Syafril Hermansyah wrote about "Test message": > Forgive me for the this test message. List--Help: Syafril! It works, except for list-help. Apparently thi should have been: List-Help: (with one single dash), AFAIK. List-Unsubscribe: L

Re: Test message

>> Forgive me for the this test message. AVK> List--Help: AVK> Syafril! It works, except for list-help. Apparently thi should have been: AVK> List-Help: Also, if you're trying to make a mailto: URL you need to lose the space. Some of the headers had 'em

Re: Test message

Hello Tom Plunket, On Saturday, January 29, 2000 at 10:57:13 GMT -0800 (which was 31/01/2000 1:57 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: >>> Forgive me for the this test message. AVK>> List--Help: AVK>> Syafril! It works, except for list-help. Apparently

Re: Test message

Hello Alexander V. Kiselev, On Friday, January 28, 2000 at 19:33:20 GMT +0300 (which was 31/01/2000 23:33 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: >> Forgive me for the this test message. AVK> List--Help: AVK> Syafril! It works, except for list-help. Apparentl

Re: Test message

Hello Syafril, On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 08:29:07 GMT +0700 (which was 5:29 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: [snip headers] > List-Help: ^ There probably shouldn't be that space in there > List-Unsubscribe: ^^^

Re: Test message

Hi Syafril, On 31 January 2000 at 08:29:07 GMT +0700 (which was 01:29 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: TP>> Also, if you're trying to make a mailto: URL you need to lose the TP>> space. Some of the headers had 'em, others didn't... SH> Sorry for my lack of unde

Re: Test message

JA> As you can see from the above, there are spaces between mailto: and JA> the address in some of the headers above. It doesn't matter yet JA> since TB doesn't support those features in any advanced way, but if JA> and when it does, this might present a problem. More to the point, the spac

Re: Test message

Hello Januk Aggarwal, On Monday, January 31, 2000 at 17:43:58 GMT -0800 (which was 31/01/2000 8:43 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: [ ... ] >> List-Administrator: JA> ^^^ JA> And the last one JA> As you can see from

Re: Test Message

Hallo Mark, On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:21:11 -0400GMT (18-9-02, 15:21 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: ME> This is a test message. Thanks. Test failed, due to lack of a signature delimiter. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1

Re: Test Message

Hi Mark, On Wednesday, September 18, 2002 09:40 your local time, (19:25 my local time), you [ME] wrote: ME> Huh?! I was just sending a test message for my new mailing list. ME> Worked ok, as the list received my message and returned it. ME> If there was an error, please clarify. The

Re: Test Message

User Roelof Otten failed test :) -- Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: test message

Hallo Allie, On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 07:27:15 -0500GMT (26-7-03, 14:27 +0200, where I live), you wrote: AM> This is a test message AM> - -- In that case: Your signature delimiter is broken. -- Groetjes, Roelof Current version is 1.62r |

Re: test message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Roelof, @26-Jul-2003, 14:42 +0200 (13:42 UK time) Roelof Otten [RO] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Allie: AM>> This is a test message AM>> - -- RO> In that case: Your signature delimiter is broken. Tell it to Phil Zimmerma

Re: test message

Hello Marck, On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:54:50 +0100 GMT (26/07/03, 19:54 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: AM>>> - -- RO>> In that case: Your signature delimiter is broken. > Tell it to Phil Zimmerman! I have another idea: Let TB recognise "- --" as a sig delimiter. AAMOF, I think this worked

Re: test message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, @26-Jul-2003, 20:14 +0700 (14:14 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: RO>>> In that case: Your signature delimiter is broken. >> Tell it to Phil Zimmerman! TF> I have another idea: Let TB recognise "- -

Re: test message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote: TF> I have another idea: Let TB recognise "- --" as a sig delimiter. TF> AAMOF, I think this worked in an earlier version. It does recognise it, but: "- -- " and not "- --" If you sign with the plugin, you get the un

RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

Hi Alexander, On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 19:33:20 +0300GMT (29/01/2000, 00:33 +0800GMT), Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: AVK> List-Unsubscribe: AVK> List-Subscribe: I believe this is with regards to the recent discussion about the unsubscribe information overhead on the bottom

Re[2]: Test Message

Huh?! I was just sending a test message for my new mailing list. Worked ok, as the list received my message and returned it. If there was an error, please clarify. Cheers Mark Wednesday, September 18, 2002, 9:41:57 AM, you wrote: RO> Hallo Mark, RO> On Wed, 18 Sep 2

Test message - please ignore

My posts have not been getting through. This is a test to see if they do now. -- Regards Robin Robin Anson Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.sil

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

Friday, January 28, 2000, 8:19:17 PM, Thomas wrote: > (I really like the "subscribe" information, as the header will be received > only by people who are subscribed already. ) Really? Let me forward you a message from one of my lists and see what headers you get compared to you being subscri

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Saturday, January 29, 2000, 8:59:09 AM, Steve wrote: SL> Friday, January 28, 2000, 8:19:17 PM, Thomas wrote: >> (I really like the "subscribe" information, as the header will be received >> only by people who are subscribed already. ) SL> Really? Let me forward

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

Hallo Steve, On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 07:59:09 -0800 GMT (29.01.2000, 23:59 +0800 GMT), Steve Lamb wrote: >> (I really like the "subscribe" information, as the header will be received >> only by people who are subscribed already. ) SL> Really? Let me forward you a message from one of my lists a

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 03:34:02AM +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > SL> Why not both until that time? It is always good to have the machine > SL> readable information there. :P > Wouldn't that be even more KB's coming down the old DUN connection? Prolly. Of course, while we're at it

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

Hallo Steve, On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 21:12:21 -0800 GMT (30.01.2000, 13:12 +0800 GMT), Steve Lamb wrote: SL> Prolly. Of course, while we're at it let's remove all the other machine SL> readable headers as well. Reply-to, reference, in-reply-to, x-sender, etc, SL> etc, etc. :) You win. ;-) --

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

Hello Steve Lamb, On Sunday, January 30, 2000 at 21:12:21 GMT -0800 (which was 31/01/2000 12:12 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: >> SL> Why not both until that time? It is always good to have the >> machine SL> readable information there. :P >> Wouldn't that be eve

Re: RFC2369 (was:Re: Test message)

Hi Syafril, On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 10:33:11 +0700GMT (31/01/2000, 11:33 +0800GMT), Syafril Hermansyah wrote: SH> Well, if needed I can stripe out any of message header (as Listar or SH> EZMLM did), our Server having this capability, perhaps later when the SH> time permitted. Never mind. Leave t

Test message only. Kindly ignore.

Kindly ignore. Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Test message - please ignore

Hello Robin, Wednesday, October 29, 2003, 4:02:38 AM, among other things you wrote: RA> My posts have not been getting through. This is a test to see if they do now. Arrived OK here -- Best regards, Roger Using The Bat! v2.01.15 on Windows ME, v4.90 Build 3000