Monday, July 12, 2004, 11:03:30 PM, Mary wrote:
MB> Hmm. I've been joking about the time machine :timemachine: but I
MB> wonder. Could our mails be lost in here: :tm:
A job is never finished until the paperwork is done. :-D
--
Regards,
Plan9 :plan9:
Two strings walk into a bar. The first str
Dear list,
Mary said:
MB> Among my first complaints here, during the evaluation
MB> phase of my acquaintance with The Bat!, was that I
MB> could not understand the Help file. It will tell you
MB> what something does--ocasionally in words that mean
MB> something to a newcomer--but it never tells yo
On Monday, July 12, 2004 @ 1:34:35 PM, Allister Jenks wrote:
[snips]
MB>> In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB>> Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help file would soon be
MB>> obsolete. I consider that I am running an obsolete version, and I have
MB>> the
Hello Plan9!
On Monday, July 12, 2004, 9:54 PM, you wrote:
P> Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:39:52 PM, Roelof wrote:
RO>> The weirdest thing however, is that my real reply, composed an hour
RO>> later was distributed within a few minutes, while my inadvertent (is
RO>> that the correct word) reply took
Hi Plan9
-
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, at 22:54:04 [GMT -0400] (which was 7:54 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:39:52 PM, Roelof wrote:
> For me weird things have been happening all day as far a e-mail is
> concerned. I have been gettin
Monday, July 12, 2004, 7:39:52 PM, Roelof wrote:
RO> The weirdest thing however, is that my real reply, composed an hour
RO> later was distributed within a few minutes, while my inadvertent (is
RO> that the correct word) reply took over seven hours to get back to me.
For me weird things have been
Hello Roelof!
On Monday, July 12, 2004, 6:39 PM, you wrote:
RO> It surprised me somewhat that this piece of [see h2g2 for
RO> translation] didn't appear any sooner on this list.
I think I may have been the only one to notice. :) And I forgave you
immediately, for the sake of your budgies and bu
Hallo Roelof,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:29:30 +0200GMT (12-7-2004, 17:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:34:35 +1200GMT (12-7-2004, 7:34 +0200, where I
RO> live), you wrote:
It surprised me somewhat that this piece of shit didn't appear any
sooner on this list.
I wanted
Hallo Allister,
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:34:35 +1200GMT (12-7-2004, 7:34 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AJ> Monday, July 12, 2004, 12:06:58 PM, Mary wrote (amongst other stuff):
MB>> In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB>> Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any
Monday, July 12, 2004, 12:06:58 PM, Mary wrote (amongst other stuff):
MB> In defense of RitLabs: the improvements that are being made in The
MB> Bat! are coming along so rapidly that any Help file would soon be
MB> obsolete. I consider that I am running an obsolete version, and I have
MB> the late
Hello Jimmie!
On Sunday, July 11, 2004, 1:32 PM, you wrote:
JT> Some instruction would be nice not just for Bayeslt but the entire program.
You are not alone. Among my first complaints here, during the
evaluation phase of my acquaintance with The Bat!, was that I could
not understand the Help fi
11 matches
Mail list logo
